Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : ABER RESOURCES -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: I_C_Deadpeople who wrote (1040)	3/16/1999 5:40:00 PM
From: .Trev	Respond to of 2006

Well I for one can't locate a copy. Can I borrow yours??? Alternatively can you in your wildest imagination dream up any rational reasin why Aber should evade, or avoid, or pretend to ignore the normal precaution of confirming in writing a deal involving almost $4 million? I haven't seen a post where anyone claims to know the outcome of the litigation. Most of are still trying to understand how a business organization could find itself in such a predicament, and then fall back on a widows and orphans, ;egislation to try to save the day.

To: I_C_Deadpeople who wrote (1040)	3/17/1999 12:26:00 AM
From: The Fix	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 2006

Are you suggesting that WSP and ABZ just had a verbal Agreement? WSP delivered a letter (Time Lapse). This is telling me that a clause was put into a contract. THEY HAD A CONTRACT! Your grasping at straws! It's an open and shut case. WSP will prove a pattern from previous history, WSP will clearly state that a budget was presented and a "call" was made. ABZ chose to ignore the call. This is elementary Law here, We are not dealing with a complicated issue here. Do you pay for your Groceries after you take them home from the supermarket? fIXER