Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Winspear Resources -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Clifford A. Brown who wrote (15945)	3/16/1999 4:51:00 PM
From: Gord Bolton	Respond to of 26850

qp.gov.bc.ca B.C. Law and Equity Act for your viewing pleasure. Estopple and more excitesearch.netscape.com

To: Clifford A. Brown who wrote (15945)	3/16/1999 5:31:00 PM
From: .Trev	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 26850

Interesting comments as usual! As an Engineer I'm equally well unqualified, except for almost 50 years in practice and some experience of construction and supply contracts. It seems quite apparent to me that it was Aber who were trying to pull some kind of marginal fast practice and got caught out. There is no logical, acceptable excuse that I can imagine for not having observed the letter of the Agreement, as well as the intent.To be used as an excuse INCOMPETENCE would have to be so TOTAL as to be embarasing in the extreme IMHO. Of course Canadian Law is based on the British system, and in any event there's no way of forecasting what the outcome might be. The prtective smokescreen that was mentioned appears to be a catchall for preventing victimization of tenants, etc but we can only wait and hope that the court will be rational.