SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Sarmad Y. Hermiz who wrote (46049)3/16/1999 7:49:00 PM
From: Rob S.  Respond to of 164684
 
You can use a PC and some conversion software but it is not as simple as that if you want to run a high volume service site. A fax machine captures an image file scanned from the paper document or converted with the FAX print driver. If you were to start out fresh today and say "How can we design a system to send variable text and graphics over these funky POTS lines?" I doubt that you would decide on the current FAX transmission scheme. But legacy rules because FAX machines can't be re-programmed to use a different standard. If you had the whole mess of graphics and text standards to do all over again, you would probably establish a large base set of standard graphic (geometric vector shapes and overlay files) and textual components that would be stored on the users hard drive and then you would use vector graphics and scalable fonts to render everything much more quickly. There have been several efforts along those lines that are continuing today, involving Adobe, Microsoft, Intel, IBM, S3, Sony and others but as much sense as a new approach would make, particularly when it comes to sending stuff over the Internet, it remains mostly mired in legacy limbo. Hindsight is 20-20 - despite all the "vision thing" that most people credit the leaders of the industry having (Gates et al), it seems that they didn't see enough of where technology was heading to anticipate the major road-blocks by the new paradigm of rich content communication over open communications media.

The advantage of a fax machine is (or has been) convenience. I don't find the fax machine very convenient today. In fact, it is a damn nuisance. The only thing remaining that makes it convenient is that they are still everywhere. But you can't send in scalable detail, you can't send to many people in color, and you can't message a fax communication easily. It is now at the point where the fax standard is more of a hindrance than a convenience, IMO. You've got to convert it from a graphic format into a text format or similar representation in order to convert it into speech - the next move up the information richness scale. And there is no good way to easily merge the arcane fax standard with streaming video - the next obvious step. The fax machine will eventually go the way of the dinosaur but it may be ten or twenty years before it finally dies completely.

Getting back to the question, lots of companies will provide EFAX type capability. They apparently are going after market share by giving it away and that has caused quite a stir. I signed up for it but was sent an email saying that they would not be able to provide an EFAX number until they took care of their backlog. Sounds like an opening to competition. I'd ride EFAX up but pull the plug at the first signs of weakness. It will probably make several runs up and down before much competition even has time to react.



To: Sarmad Y. Hermiz who wrote (46049)3/17/1999 6:51:00 AM
From: Olu Emuleomo  Respond to of 164684
 
>>I mean, you can use a screw driver or a pliers to hammer down a nail, but a hammer is
more suited to the job.

I hear you! That's why Information appliances are gonna supplant the PC. Witness the success of the palm pilot.
Also, watch out for $250 Internet appliances.
Large screen (19 inch), Proprietary chip or Cyrix/AMD/Celeron chip, small hard-disk 2gig or so, Proprietary OS or Windoze 98 and nic-card for cable modem.
Everything else, extra.
I would buy 2. One for myself and another for my mother! Then I dont have to call her as often; just send her e-mail :-))

--Olu E.