SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : IFLY - travel sales on the web pure play -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Anthony@Pacific who wrote (4433)3/16/1999 11:17:00 PM
From: StockDung  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 4761
 
"(In homage to National Public Radio's Marketplace, fans of that show should now put their favorite version of "We're in the Money" on the stereo as we run the numbers.) The PEG sits at an especially attractive 0.50 using the current stock price of about $18. Using the low end of Emerald's long-term growth estimates combined with the median FY '97 earnings projections which are lower than Emerald's, the YPEG says the price in late 1997 should be at about $25. With an expected revenue per share of $12 in 1997, a stock price of $25 will reflect a price-to-sales ratio at a very reasonable 2.0.
Pitch #132: Dueling Fools: Iomega (4B)
by Mike Buckley and Rick Munarriz (MF Buck and MF Edible)"

As the maker of the ever-popular Zip Drive, Iomega (NYSE:IOM) has made it acceptable to talk about storage technology at cocktail parties again. As quickly as Zip drives and disks have flown off the store shelves over the last two years Iomega has found its stock soar until it corrected sharply last year. With the higher capacity Jaz and the Ditto & Bernoulli lines of tape backups the company has gone from financial uncertainty to solid profitability in that span of time.

MF Buck winds up with the Bullish Pitch: It's almost laughable -- OK, it's completely laughable. -- that I'm building a case for buying Iomega stock using only two paragraphs, recognizing that for two years it has probably been the most followed, analyzed, and discussed stock in all of Fooldom. We probably would need a Zip drive, maybe a Jaz drive, to store on one disk the reams of messages in the Graveyard supporting Emerald Research's impression that "Zip's floppy replacement story is still intact and there is no rewritable technology that has the same potential to succeed during the next few years." Though the Jaz is no slouch, understanding the essence of Iomega requires understanding the Zip since it is expected to bring in roughly two-thirds of the company's revenue and gross profit in the near future. Its low drive cost (attractive to OEMs) and low disk cost (attractive to users) helped make it possible to beat its primary competition, the remarkably unattractively named LS-120 and UHC, to market by about two years. That was and remains a reasonable trade-off for the one objection that the Zip drive is not backward compatible with floppies. Let the relatively few who need backward compatibility have their relatively small share of the market. The future product line looks for Iomega's n*hand to eventually "eclipse the Zip market" (Dataquest's opinion), for the Jaz to double storage capacity about every two years, and for the Zip disk growth -- where the real money is -- to increase more than 20% quarter-to-quarter over the next eight quarters resulting in 50 million Zip disks shipped in about the 3rd quarter of 1998. That's an expected five-fold growth in only two years. As they say, "It's the disks, stupid."

Now that we've established that this is a company with great products, what about the price of the stock? (In homage to National Public Radio's Marketplace, fans of that show should now put their favorite version of "We're in the Money" on the stereo as we run the numbers.) The PEG sits at an especially attractive 0.50 using the current stock price of about $18. Using the low end of Emerald's long-term growth estimates combined with the median FY '97 earnings projections which are lower than Emerald's, the YPEG says the price in late 1997 should be at about $25. With an expected revenue per share of $12 in 1997, a stock price of $25 will reflect a price-to-sales ratio at a very reasonable 2.0. All in all, based on the information I've read, I expect the price of the stock to be at least 40% higher in the next year than it is now, higher yet if the momentum players take over again on the upside. I also believe there is a case to be made that this stock has the potential to double over the next year based on fundamentals alone. Countering MF Edible's points (which I've yet to see) probably doesn't require me making that case so I haven't tried. (Since you didn't ask, Emerald Research used 22 pages, a far cry from my two paragraphs, to do exactly that -- to substantiate a projected double in the stock's price by the end of 1997.)

MF Edible takes the mound for the Bears: Brand me a Motley heretic, dump me in a river to see if I float, but I don't understand why Iomega is worth its $2.5 billion market capitalization. I mean, I got the same butterflies when I saw the drives magically disappear from computer stores in 1995, but as they moved into more mainstream venues last year, as Iomega ads canvassed the print media, as they piled more dirt on SyQuest's coffin, I grew jaded. After such a successful 1995, why was the company out of money in 1996? When they were all set for a secondary offering, why did the underwriters back out, forcing the company to offer convertible stock instead? The problem is that Iomega is, for all practical purposes, a one product company. The Ditto tape backup line is not proprietary as they duke it out with a handful of other players in the QIC price wars. Their own backup technology, Bernoulli, has been rendered obsolete. The Jaz has proven too expensive to compete with cheaper media like read-write CD-ROMs.

This boils down to the Zip, a present day monster that has devoured the market, as the only proven winner in the Iomega portfolio. But in a fickle market where technology has a short shelf-life (Bernoulli, SyQuest anyone?) the second tier analysts who follow the company are expecting $0.83 in 1997 in what has to be a shot in the dark attempt at forecasting. While picking up last year's winner for 20 times forward earnings seems enticing, the future is uncertain. Why? Well, serious competition is around the corner as the LS-120, being produced by much deeper pockets than Iomega, will introduce similar Zip capacity but in a format that is backward compatible to the floppy disk. This almost renders the Zip's early lead pointless since there are probably between 100-200 million computers users with 3.5" disk drives who have yet to upgrade to a 100 MB+ disk format, compared to the 4 million or so Zip users. There are also margins to consider since the widespread sell-off in the technology sector have found the prices on memory chips and hard drives in freefall. With hard drives going for half the price they were when the Zip was introduced, can Iomega hold on to their asking prices? No, and that is evident by the $50 rebate on their Zip drives with more margin erosion if the price of Zip disks drops faster than their ability to shave costs in the manufacturing end. While they might make it up in volume, who is to say that the demand will be there as the public becomes enamored with LS-120? But the LS-120 won't be forever, either, as technology is ever-changing, and one-hit wonders like Iomega may soon find their way to the "Where are they Now" column.

Here's the Pitch, for a HOMER. . .

At market close on MONDAY, JANUARY 20th (the last day of the current Today's Pitch Season), where will Iomega (NYSE: IOM, $17) close?

a) above 23, soaring?
b) from 21 to 23, uplifted?
c) between 19 and 21, steady?
d) from 17 to 19, bearing down?
e) below 17, hit hard?

Disclaimers: a) the positions taken by the Dueling Fools may or may not reflect their own opinions of the stock, b) the authors may or may not hold long or short positions, and c) as always, discussion of the stock in a Pitch does not constitute a recommendation of any kind by the Motley Fool, for or against.

Transmitted: 2/9/98 1:45 PM (s5p132)



To: Anthony@Pacific who wrote (4433)3/16/1999 11:19:00 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 4761
 
"Pennsylvania-based Emerald Research recently issued a short- and long-term "speculative buy" rating on the company, with a possibly "conservative" 12-month price target of $26 a share. Emerald estimates that the company will see $1.31 a share in earnings for fiscal '97 and $2.00 a share for fiscal '98."

The investment community calls them "story stocks," the kind that promise almost instant riches and send the momentum investors into fits of salivation. The companies are usually small and from the out-of-nowhere regions. But they all offer some can't-miss product with virtually unlimited potential.

For the most part, these companies don't appear on the mainstream investment community's radar until, like a Comparator Systems, they explode: first up, then down. Amidst the Wall Street cognoscenti, story stocks are of interest mainly to that pack of short-sellers keen on finding suckers ripe for some bloodletting. These stocks also interest those well-placed pundits who are always looking for a good excuse to pontificate about the stupidity of individual investors going it on their own.

Of course, there's a reason these "stories" so often end badly: the story is all there is. When a company has lots of news releases but little cash, too much debt, too many shares outstanding, no sales, maybe even no product, the odds are pretty good that when the final curtain falls, the stage will be strewn with corpses. It's relatively rare for the story to end with happy investors trotting down the aisle committed to a blissful long-term relationship with the company.

In a year full of great story stocks, few have been more compelling than QUIGLEY CORPORATION (Nasdaq: QUIG). Based in Doylestown, Pennsylvania, Quigley is a tiny company with an almost too-good-to-be-true product: a simple and inexpensive zinc gluconate lozenge that has been shown in clinical trials to actually reduce the duration of the common cold by about 42%, from 7.6 days on average to just 4.4 days.

Researchers still disagree on how zinc gluconate might work, but leading advocates of the therapy believe it exerts an antiviral effect on the human rhinovirus, the most common cause of colds. That would help explain the anecdotal reports that the lozenges can even stave off a cold if taken at the first sign of symptoms.

No other product ever investigated has shown such remarkable efficacy against this troublesome and ubiquitous illness. Whereas other cold products just treat the symptoms, Quigley's Cold-Eeze is said to speed up the cold process while simultaneously ameliorating many of the symptoms. And Quigley has exclusive rights to two key patents, making Cold-Eeze a seemingly proprietary franchise in what is a multibillion dollar annual market full of products that cost more but accomplish a great deal less. And at just $5.99 for about a three day's supply of lozenges, Cold-Eeze seems to be not just a terrific product, but an unbeatable value.

Just as important for investors, the company has rapidly built a consumer following. For the last year, Quigley has been selling lozenges on the QVC home shopping network. And recent coverage from CNBC's "Steals and Deals," the Boston Globe, the Chicago Tribune, and other media outlets has provided loads of free advertising that's helped jack up demand way beyond the company's capacity to produce the lozenges. Consumers are reportedly scooping up new shipments before retailers can get them on the shelves.

In early December, the company said it was receiving $500,000 a week in new orders and was planning a rapid expansion of its contract manufacturing capacity to meet its $3.5 million order backlog -- about seven times its total sales for 1995. In a phone interview with Rogue two weeks ago, company CEO Guy Quigley said that new manufacturing equipment was now being installed and that the company would soon be able to produce "at least" $1 million worth of lozenges each week

The next day, Quigley announced an additional expansion that will raise production capacity to $3 million per week by early 1997. The same press release indicated that the company had received new orders from Walgreen's and Revco totaling $2.5 million and an unexpected order from Zee Medical, Inc., a division of McKesson Corporation, to supply Cold-Eeze for 300,000 first aid cabinets in office sites throughout the U.S. The Zee Medical purchase was valued at $7.5 million for the first year.

(The 10K annual report released this week indicates that the company's manufacturing capacity will reach $1.5 million per week by the end of January with more capacity coming on-line "shortly thereafter." This SEC filing also notes that as of December 26th, Quigley had a purchase order backlog of $7.5 million.)

Given such exceptional demand, it's no surprise that investors have gone gaga over Quigley. The stock has more than tripled in value over the last two months. Even more astonishing, the shares have actually soared to the recent price of $18 a share from just $0.62 a share in April. A thousand dollars invested in the company just eight months ago would now be worth about $29,000.

Curiously enough, the stock has skyrocketed even as the company has offered additional shares. The company currently has 6.05 million shares outstanding. This figure represents a dramatic increase over the 3.2 million shares outstanding after a 10-for-1 reverse stock split orchestrated last January, as well as a significant boost from the 4.2 million shares outstanding as of June 30th or the 5.6 million outstanding as of September. Quigley also has outstanding warrants allowing holders to purchase up to 2.35 million shares for as little as $1.00 per share.

The company is currently trying to raise additional cash through a private placement "in an amount undetermined at this moment," according to CEO Quigley. (The recent 10K says the offering would be in the $6 to $8 million range.)

Given the company's apparent growth prospects, however, none of this dilution seems to have bothered investors. Since Quigley's officers and patent holders own a significant chunk of shares, there are only about 2 million shares in the float, according to Quigley. And even assuming some further dilution over the next year, Pennsylvania-based Emerald Research recently issued a short- and long-term "speculative buy" rating on the company, with a possibly "conservative" 12-month price target of $26 a share. Emerald estimates that the company will see $1.31 a share in earnings for fiscal '97 and $2.00 a share for fiscal '98.

On the other hand, Quigley has been and still is a very small company. Recent filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission show a firm that has been barely scraping by. Because Quigley has suffered net losses since its inception in 1989, its accountant has been forced to raise the question of whether the company can continue as a going concern.

And the latest 10Q filing for the quarter ended June 30th showed sales declining by 20% for the first nine months of fiscal 1996, to a meager $323,726, even though Cold-Eeze lozenges were already being sold via Walgreen's and QVC. Working capital stood at about a quarter million dollars, with just $85,000 of cash on hand at the quarter's end.

Year-end numbers released this week do show rocketing sales in the fiscal fourth quarter (after the latest trial results were made public). But sales totaled just $1.05 million for the year. Moreover, the company still reported a loss of nearly $700,000. On the other hand, the increased sales and new private placements have raised working capital to about one million dollars, with cash on hand of $370,000 as of September 30th.

And the business does seem to be growing at a fantastic rate. On January 2nd, the company announced that it was expecting $3.9 million in revenues and $1.8 million in earnings (or $0.30 per share) for the first quarter just ended. Curiously, this press release indicated that back orders stood at $11 million as of December 31st (an enormous $3.5 million increase over the figure given in the 10K).

Still, the company was only recently so small that a loan for a single company car represented a significant balance sheet item in its third quarter filing. The company has even offered stock to pay for basic operating expenses such as advertising costs. It's hard not to agree with the poster in The Motley Fool's Quigley folder who found this 10Q to be an amusing read. One's tempted to ask: Is this really a *public* company?

The point is that the Quigley story should make even the most naive investors apprehensive enough to ask some basic questions. Is it really possible that the company's zinc lozenges can work such wonders? If they can, how is it that a small company in Pennsylvania created to market a sumptuous but unprofitable health food bar came to hold patents on the lozenges?

Indeed, the first clinical trial showing remarkable efficacy for the zinc lozenges was published in 1984. What in the world has taken so long to get this amazing product to market? And why wasn't it scooped up by some pharmaceutical titan with loads of muscle in the over-the-counter market for cold therapies? Moreover, if the product is really so great, will the patents actually hold up against the inevitable competition?

Finally, even if the Cold-Eeze story stands up to a thorough inquisition, can the Quigley Corporation? The company has only 10 employees, not including its contract manufacturers. Even Emerald Research has expressed the desire to see some more seasoned managers brought in to guide the company through what investors hope will be quite dynamic growth. Then, of course, there are the repeated warnings from short-sellers that Quigley is a stock rig, one of a long line of companies listed on the OTC bulletin board that have fleeced small investors out of their life savings and lined the pockets of stock promoters.

As is so often the case, Rogue has uncovered a story of intrigue behind this story stock. But perhaps what is most intriguing is how convincingly the story of Quigley's zinc gluconate-glycine lozenge, at least, pans out.

It is true, for example, that Dr. Jack Gwaltney, Jr., a world-renowned expert on the common cold, completely rejects the efficacy claims being made for Quigley's zinc gluconate lozenges. It is also true that George Eby, the primary patent holder on the use of zinc salts in the oral treatment of common colds, has licensed two zinc acetate products that are just hitting the market and should compete with the Cold-Eeze lozenges. Finally, it is also true that some of the largest pharmaceutical companies, including Bristol Myers and SmithKline Beecham, considered marketing a zinc gluconate lozenge only to decide against it.

A number of questions remain to be answered. But Rogue's study of the published research combined with interviews with the principal investigators suggest that Quigley may indeed be on to something genuine.



To: Anthony@Pacific who wrote (4433)3/16/1999 11:20:00 PM
From: Marty Rubin  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 4761
 
a@p, r u still short on sevl? did you take the 25-100% or still hanging? tnx.