To: 5,17,37,5,101,... who wrote (449 ) 3/17/1999 7:20:00 AM From: QuietWon Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2515
I don't think there are much in shorts - anyone who has read anything about IMCL would have recognized what the co has. Initially, when got in , thought they would have got coverage, etc, but that was wishful thinking. The fact is, and I've compared it to several companies, IMCL's technique works, and the co is conservative - if anybody read my posts giving my opinion on their conservatism, comparison to other co's they would not have wanted to short this. Here is the development of the shorts' arguments :Message 8249128 <-the Q whenMessage 8249212 <-A says waitMessage 8249279 <-Cube spks out Message 8249385 <-Bear says cautionMessage 8249703 <-xcl of long order - when did anyone mention long?Message 8249718 <-A xcl's short -- when was short mentioned by A - implies was going to shortMessage 8249957 <- realization news cud be explosiveMessage 8249974 <- "good call" not to short - well, if you'd seen anythin from my analysis, why would anyone think of shorting on the fundamnetals??Message 8250130 <- truth vs ego - not trying to be ego, but haven't heard anything to acknowledge the research & comments by all on the IMCL thread, company is conservative Message 8250205 -- how come this doesn't appear on the A@P picks page?Message 8250206 <- realization that IMCL has options - did anyone notice Marty's mention that 780 contracts went off and then I found it was all in 1 block and bot at 5/16 !!!Message 8250266 <-they think it is real vs a scamMessage 8250408 <-- no kidding, but mention of Merck makes it seem like Merck USA, which it is not.Message 8250486 -- 1st person to mention short now comes around to thinking longMessage 8250488 -- bot the callsMessage 8250526 -- how many times someone got to say it, if you read this thread, you would have been in in the 9's at worst caseMessage 8250535 <-- A did short it and then went long - how did in a relatively short time span, does one do an investigation of the fundamentals? - well, angain if they listened to 5,17,37,5,101's , Marty's, me, JEB's comments...Message 8250594 <-- hadn't anyone listened / read my posts comparing IMCL vs the opthers?Message 8250714 <-- so the alert to short, did get reversedMessage 8250811 <-- no kidding !!!Message 8250823 <-- wow, in a minute, going from short to long - maybe it's only me, but i can't go long or short something unless i have a bit of an idea of the company. If you know something and there is mention of the co on CNBC, you can grab profits - like GERN over a year ago, like COF. Sure there are many co's I know nothing about, but I've researched somewhere like 500 or so copmanies and have a bit of an idea of what each does. Again, shorting / longing a co, i know nothing about scares the heck out of meMessage 8250863 <- how many times - finally - mention the co is real - what had i been trying to say for about 3 monthsMessage 8250989 My point 5,17,37,5,101 is there are few persons short, imo