Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : LAST MILE TECHNOLOGIES - Let's Discuss Them Here -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Frank A. Coluccio who wrote (3149)	3/17/1999 11:29:00 AM
From: Raymond Duray	Respond to of 12823

>Wow... this new mode of comm'ing with people you don't even know is sure spooky.< But what an advance over present kludges! <gg>

To: Frank A. Coluccio who wrote (3149)	3/18/1999 8:22:00 PM
From: Phil Jacobson	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 12823

Wow... this new mode of comm'ing with people you don't even know is sure spooky. Cuases one to rub their eyes. Frank, You made me think of something I thought you'd enjoy. Last year when Jim Cramer was angry at the CLECs for making him lose money I wrote him an e-mail describing how most of them are simply building assets in strategic ways to make themselves useful to much larger players who will buy them out later. I wrote that they're simply "players to be named later" and the best will eventually make money for shareholders. Next day he was on CNBC and I was shocked out of my chair when he proceeded to articulate my argument in detail and called the CLECs "players to be named later" (no attribution of course <g>). Couldn't stop thinking, my god, I type it into my PC, and 12 hours later it gets spoken back to me on my television....what kind of world is this?? Phil