Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JBL who wrote (39012)	3/17/1999 10:18:00 AM
From: Zoltan!	Respond to of 67261

There is no evidence. The source for the story is Kitty Kelley of all people. The one who intimated that Nancy and Frank Sinatra had "afternoon delight" in the WH. The supposed "victim" of this other Kelley creation is conveniently long dead and there exists no evidence of any kind. The alleged source of the source is some off the wall loser who can't sell her book.

To: JBL who wrote (39012)	3/18/1999 5:38:00 AM
From: iandiareii	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

JBL-- Ian, you cannot compare the level of evidence in the Broadrick and Walter case. Yours is a fair response. But I contend that we must compare the two in order to get anywhere with the latest accusation against our shabby president. Rape is a brutal crime, and I propose to treat this matter seriously. Under what conditions can we say that allegations like this should be believed? Believing them, what actions should we take? Juanita Broaddrick's charge, even if true, cannot now be acted upon in any meaningful way. That is, it seems to me, unless we use it to address both the circumstances surrounding the very crime of rape and the means to prosecute such crimes. How might this be done? ian