Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Precious Metals mutual funds (gold, silver, PGMs) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Richard Mazzarella who wrote (346)	3/17/1999 12:05:00 PM
From: IngotWeTrust	Respond to of 972

What Larry's posting=good info. I don't take Barron's either and NOT getting that particular info Larry's posting (except when old John Murphy of CNBC's good old days deigned to mention it) has not been a good enough reason to subscribe to Abelson's Bearsheet. So, I was sincere when I posted that I noticed his posting of same and was sincere when I said thank you. Last I looked, Larry did need your permission to acknowledge that and say you're welcome. Or did you forget to tell him SI is a PUBLIC forum? Larry is sharp, he knows about societal niceties, his reply key obviously works ....for replying to everyone but me it would appear. So, his rudeness toward me is rather obvious. And without basis in fact or history. There is no blame for you to accept. Larry's a grown man or whatever. He is responsible for his actions. I've made my point. Now, to be topic related: How come YOU didn't give him feedback re: "the surplus that isn't" post he requested feedback about?? Is he only good for birddogging one item at your fervent behest and YOU are being rude not to reply to his obvious and pointed solictation for a civil response? I've got no beef w/you, Mazzaman! Never did. But somewhere along SI way, you moved from a friendly exchange to bristling everytime you saw my name. And there have been plenty of friendly greetings and profers of informational exchange with you, initiated by me since the old days when we usta debate USRX-TA with great frequency. Seems like my calls were pretty good, i.e., at least my bank account benefitted! So, are you implying that his rudeness is somehow connected to your COA and barely sheathed disain towards me? I'm good for precious metals mutual fund based discussion exchanges, always have been, always will be. Was source of PGM's mutual thread mention upon occasion (SI/USRX thread). Ditto Prodigy. And I still keep in touch with the old gang of which you usta be an enthusiastic participant. In fact, I had even carved out a niche of respect for you and your TA. So, are you gonna let whatever sticks in your craw about me prevent you from discussing PGM's M/F with me, TA, portfolio mix, XAU related, whatEVER? How about it...gonna flog me with 40 lashes of a sodden Barron's issue now? Hmmm...

To: Richard Mazzarella who wrote (346)	3/20/1999 11:56:00 PM
From: Larry S.	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 972

Richard, et al, Barron's GMI was 314.77 on 3/18, down from 329.91 the previous week. With the POG up to 283.70 (3/19), the ratio is 1.11, down slightly from last week's 1.128. It continues at a level that is nearly off the chart and, based on the date referenced in post 10, it is in the range of values that strongly suggest the XAU will be substantially higher within a year. I looked a the XAU charts again and I noticed that the weekly charts indicates that, while it been hanging around the lower Bollinger band, it jumped off the lower band this week with a hanging man candle stick pattern. This would make both the daily and weekly charts equally bullish. Is this the way you would read them Richard? Cheers, Larry