Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Maxtor (MXTR) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dave who wrote (181)	3/17/1999 10:03:00 AM
From: appro	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 467

>>Merrill just re-iterated<< Consider the source. MSNBC on "vagaries of research": msnbc.com Excerpts: >>But no firm wants to alienate a potential client by knocking its stock. That in turn leads to the current state of Wall Street investment research, in which no analyst who wants to keep his job issues a “sell” recommendation on a hot stock. The safer choice is to opt for such meaningless euphemisms as “hold,” “accumulate” or “long-term accumulate.” Then, only after the stock has fallen nearly to zero, does the firm issue the dreaded “sell” — witness, for example, how Merrill Lynch & Co., the underwriter of Boston Chicken Inc., rode the stock down from $40 to nearly $3 before telling its investors to bail out. Yet rarely does one encounter a more craven flip-flop — or more unconvincing rhetorical waltzing to justify it — than that put on by Merrill on behalf of Amazon.com … a company for which Merrill has now hired back-to-back analysts with diametrically opposed opinions about the stock while all the while insisting that Merrill, as a firm, has no opinion on Amazon.com one way or the other. .... No, I think it is evidence of an investment firm looking to suck up to a company that is clearly going to need debt and equity underwriting support from Wall Street for as far into the future as the eye can see.