Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Nuinsco Resources (NWI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Buckey who wrote (1783)	3/17/1999 10:46:00 AM
From: Mark Hollenbeck	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5821

NOw what it is economic still but where do we wait we are still waiting pt pd results maybe we might get a surprise.

To: Buckey who wrote (1783)	3/17/1999 10:49:00 AM
From: mineman	Respond to of 5821

98-9 was an 45 degree hole so the true width = 2 m, not 3 m. The grade at 6% is encouraging, but would be needed at 100 meter mining depth. 99-4 was vertical so the true width = 2.3 meters. So the average width of this zone may be about 2.5 metres, which appears to be not wide enough for large tonnage to be developed sufficient to support an underground 100 metre-deep operation. The average grade at 8% would compensate for underground room-and-pillar dilution. But over-riding this is that the 2.3 m zone is not thick enough to have the potential for viable tonnage. Of course this synopsis could change if future drilling intersects thicker areas of the same zone.