To: Alex who wrote (30236 ) 3/17/1999 8:39:00 PM From: goldsnow Respond to of 116801
FOCUS - U.S. senators question White House policy on Iraq 07:00 p.m Mar 17, 1999 Eastern By Patrick Connole WASHINGTON, March 17 (Reuters) - U.S. senators sharply criticised Clinton administration policies on Wednesday that let Iraq sell oil while the United States bombs the country to contain its weapons capability. Senators from both parties, in a joint meeting of the Foreign Relations and Energy panels, questioned what they called a contradiction in U.S. policy: Bombing campaigns to force Baghdad to comply with arms inspections on one hand, and, on the other hand, U.S. support for raising the amounts of oil Iraq can export under the U.N. oil-for-food relief programme. ''The so-called 'oil-for-food' programme may have worthy humanitarian goals, but Saddam is using the increased oil capacity to smuggle oil products for hard cash,'' said Sen. Frank Murkowski, a Republican from Alaska. ''They are either our enemy or not. Are we continuing to prop up the regime of a despot?...That clearly seems to be the case,'' Murkowski said. In defending administration policy, Energy Secretary Bill Richardson and Undersecretary of State for Political Affairs Thomas Pickering denied that U.S. support for lifting the amount of oil Iraq can pump under the U.N. oil programme hurts domestic producers, or helps Saddam Hussein. ''The U.S. has always said sanctions are aimed at the current Iraqi regime, not its people. The oil-for-food programme has been, and remains, evidence that we take Saddam's responsibility to feed his people seriously, even when he does not,'' Richardson said. Sen. Don Nickles, an Oklahoma Republican, said Iraq has re-emerged, under the U.N. programme, as a major player in oil markets, adding to a supply glut that has ''put 40,000 to 50,000 people out of work'' across U.S. ''oilpatch'' states. New Mexico Democrat Sen. Jeff Bingaman, while noting that the Clinton administration needed to better manage its Iraqi policies, said it was the Republican Bush administration which in 1991 first pushed through the U.N. Security Council an oil export relief plan for Iraq. ''Iraq rejected such U.N.-managed oil sales until 1996 when the misery of the Iraqi people became a major public relations problem,'' Bingaman said. Richardson called Iraq only a ''marginal'' player on the world oil stage, and refuted claims by U.S. oil industry officials that Saddam was a crucial ''swing'' oil producer. ''Saudi Arabia is the swing producer, not Iraq,'' Richardson said. He noted that while Iraq is currently producing 2.5 million barrels per day, it possessed no capacity to increase that level for at least the next year or two. Iraq is only able to generate around $3 billion every six months from its oil sales, well below the $5.26 billion ceiling set by the U.N. Security Council, Richardson said. ''The best way to help the domestic oil industry is to increase demand by helping to re-build the Asian economy and to lower production costs at home,'' Richardson said. He noted that Department of Energy studies showed the Asian economic weakness, combined with dramatically warmer winters, Iraqi production and increased output from other OPEC nations have all sent world oil prices tumbling to historic lows. ''Because these factors interact in the world oil market, it is difficult to state precisely how much of an impact each factor contributed,'' Richardson said. Copyright 1999 Reuters Limited.