SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mani1 who wrote (52777)3/17/1999 3:46:00 PM
From: Paul Engel  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1578705
 
Mani - Re: "Merced was due in 1998"

WRONG AGAIN !!!

Where do you come up with this nonsense?

Do you make it up all by yourself?

Hint: It was the K63 that was due in 1998.

Paul



To: Mani1 who wrote (52777)3/17/1999 4:05:00 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Respond to of 1578705
 
<Thanks for the tip. Merced was due in 1998. So I guess it is worse for Intel.>

Really? When I joined Intel, Merced was due in late 1999. The chipset and motherboard was still on schedule for that date when the Merced processor slipped six months.

Tenchusatsu


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News