Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Janice Shell who wrote (54236)	3/17/1999 11:28:00 PM
From: Angel D	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 55532

Janice, I'm sorry. Perhaps I didn't make myself clear. I was trying to say that two people can use one account at the same time. I realize that, from your experience, you might be more concerned with one person using two or three accounts. :) I'm quite aware of tracing IP addresses, etc. (Just because we were duped on a stock doesn't mean that we are totally stupid < said the Angel as he left the door open for a smashing response>.) Without getting too technical, that doesn't mean that two people couldn't be in bed together, or at the kitchen table together, using the same computer. Right? Besides, I would think that SI has far too big a job to do without tracing the IP addresses of every poster. As far as your concern that certain people be stopped from misleading future investors, this stock hasn't traded for about 15 months. I doubt that anyone is about to be misled here. If your concern is with other stocks, then I would request that you post on those threads. I don't read them. As I have said many times, I only concern myself with stocks in which I have an investment. At this time, your presence here only serves to disrupt any constructive action which there may be left to be taken. Sorry, but that's the facts. I appreciate that we can have an exchange without resorting to insults. You are an intelligent person and if you have something to offer of value, I would be among the first to thank you. I fear, however, that bashing Pugs and Riley only serves to continue polarizing the shareholders. I really don't think that this is what you are trying to accomplish. Most of us have already come to some reasonable conclusions. Some of us are still looking for the answers on Riley. If you continue to bash him, all that you will do is give impetus to some to gather around him. If you have verifiable facts, please provide them. In the meantime, as I have said, we shareholders wish to go after the main players in this scam. If others are involved, then I believe that they will fall too. If they're not guilty, then you'll have too admit a mistake, just as we have had to. I really don't know who all the culprits are. I would like to know. However, none of us will ever find out if we continue to bash each other. Other threads, other business. Do what you feel is right on them. However, this is the RMIL thread and it would be nice if we could take care of our business (and I hope that it can be some very nasty business for the guilty parties). Regards, AD

To: Janice Shell who wrote (54236)	4/12/1999 8:26:00 AM
From: I Am John Galt	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

It's not that simple. You can't use two accounts at the same time, as Angel is claiming Mike did. Angel claims that Mike Kugler was posting using s martin's name, and "didn't miss a beat." Well, the only way that he could've gone from s martin's account to the Mike Kugler account is if he shut down Netscape or MSIE (depending on what he used that day), start it back up again, go back to silicon investor, and type in the private msg. First of all, why would he do that, when he could just private msg him through the use of s martin's account in s martin's name? That's the part that doesn't make any sense. And without "losing a beat" in the conversation? I'd sooner believe the magic bullet theory. MG