Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (39115)	3/17/1999 4:55:00 PM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Oh Tiny. You are such a dope. Insults are NEVER pointless and they aren't insults either if they are true statements. I'd say based upon your extensive body of drivel that you are the one with the hateful life. You are quite humorless, unimaginative, thin lipped and negative in the extreme. No slight is too small to escape your notice. Bubba is never wrong. He's your hero despite overwhelming evidence of perjury, obstruction, affirmative lying to the American people and now credible rape allegations. I don't find you amusing, just really sad. JLA

To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (39115)	3/18/1999 1:44:00 AM
From: Dwight E. Karlsen	Respond to of 67261

hey, looks like you've been reading the "Handy Pocket Democrat Debating Glossary": Page 1: "You might choose to get on with your hateful life sometime too, but what fun would that be?": Say this when you've been beat fair and square in a an argument on moral issues. Page 2: "Who killed Vince Foster, anyway"? Say this when you can't think of any reponse that would make sense to a thinking person. It'll throw 'em off guard. They'll start thinking of just who may have killed Vince Foster. Like they'll ever find out! Hehe. And don't you dare tell. Looks like an interesting read there, Daniel.

To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (39115)	3/18/1999 1:59:00 AM
From: Neocon	Respond to of 67261

A word to Daniel, jlallen, vaughn, and some others--- From Aristotle's Eudemaian Ethics: "Wittiness also is a middle state, and the witty man is midway between the boorish or stiff man and the buffoon. For just as in the matter of food the squeamish man differs from the omnivorous in that the former takes nothing or little, and that reluctantly, and the latter accepts everything readily, so the boor stands in relation to the vulgar man or buffoon--the former takes no joke except with difficulty, the latter accepts everything easily and with pleasure. Neither course is right: one should allow some things and not others, and on principle,--that constitutes the witty man. The proof of the formula is the same as in the other cases: wittiness of this kind (not the quality to which we apply the term in a transferred sense) is a very becoming sort of character, and also a middle state is praiseworthy, whereas extremes are blameworthy.