SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Micron Only Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TREND1 who wrote (43970)3/17/1999 7:43:00 PM
From: J. P.  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 53903
 
I know you been doing this a long time, here's my experience...

Ain't no fancy book can teach you to trade options!

I make a lot of consistent money in options. The only thing I do is buy calls or puts naked (the options, not me -g-) and let em ride (again, the options, not me -g-).

The only caveat is you have to have the proper market analysis, the correct security analysis, then you have to have the courage of your convictions to weather the inevitable storms. Oh yea, you have to have a good instinctive feel for perfect leverage points...then you have to know when to buy, and you have to know when to sell...and you can forget about all the loss cutting schemes and stops you always hear about....did I leave anything out? Oh yea, before you start making money, you have to fail about 1000 times, and lose all your money at least twice, and if you then fail some more, my advice is to give it up, buy an index fund, and do something much easier, which is just about anything -G-

EDIT: Oh yea, I forgot, you have to know how to get a good fill on your contracts so the market maker doesn't do to you what Clinton did to Kathleen Willey...



To: TREND1 who wrote (43970)3/18/1999 1:18:00 AM
From: Skeeter Bug  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 53903
 
>>The classic text books say the best option plays are to write covered
calls ...and be moderate bullish at that time.<<

those same books that all the losers you cite read? notice a correlation? hal ought to be able to crunch the answer to that ;-)