Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (39175)	3/18/1999 8:25:00 AM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Its a cultivated skill. Missing the point is a useful tool when you routinely defend the indefensible. JLA

To: Neocon who wrote (39175)	3/18/1999 10:52:00 AM
From: Daniel Schuh	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 67261

Right, Neocon. The comparison of official legal harassment of the political opposition in Singapore to the interplay of official inquisitor Starr and his law partner Porter on the Paula Jones suit against Clinton is totally bogus and embarrassing to bring up. Or do you want to go through the "guileless Paula Jones" and her "simple litigators" line again? Anyway, Starr and partner Porter were just after the "truth", right? I get the point just fine, but the point is highly debatable. Saying how "embarrassed" you are by me making the comparison isn't exactly addressing the point, either.