Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : ECNC: BETTING, INC. A WAGER ON NEW GAMING TECHNOLOGY -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Steven G. Trapp & Company who wrote (1532)	3/18/1999 2:59:00 PM
From: Fli-by	Respond to of 2909

Look it up.

To: Steven G. Trapp & Company who wrote (1532)	3/18/1999 3:22:00 PM
From: jmhollen	Respond to of 2909

Dear Mr. Trapp, I don't believe I mentioned " BETT ",..... And, we presume you didn't inhale..., so maybe it didn't count from your current DEFINITION of your immediate point of view, hmmmmm..?? I did you the courtesy of not mentioning specifics. I'd be pleased to invite some folks over here - and have them do a dissertation on your merits as a poster; but, I think everyone here remembers you - without that being necessary. Another choice would be to copy a few of your applicable messages here, which led to your little "SI-enforced [..didn't see any challenge to that fact..] vacation". If you want to split hairs over gross generalities - this discussion can become just as specific as you wish it to be. If you desire to participate in an honest, open discussion of the merits (pro or con) of BETTING, INC., you'd probably meet with negligible resistance. But, if you think you're going to ditty-bop back in here - and spam your "paid-for hype" about other companies, I personally wouldn't wager $0.01 on your chances. You thoroughly aggravated most of the "stockholding members" of this thread on your last go round; so, you make your own judgement as to exactly how you wish to proceed. Calculating the costs might also be appropriate. The COMMON COURTESY when introducing unrelated material to a stock thread - is to identify it with an Off Topic, <OFF TOPIC>, (O/T), or "..I'm a stupid spammer who wants to butt in..". Since you didn't even bother with that, you were: a) questionably unaware of this procedure ( - not any more - ) b) think it doesn't apply to you ( - wouldn't bet on it - ) Those are the ground rules, old Son..! Now, everybody's watching YOU! Hold 'em, fold 'em, - or play what you think is a "winner". John :-)