Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : IMOT, the Yahoo of China?? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: johnlag who wrote (587)	3/18/1999 3:44:00 PM
From: Grainne	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 781

John, I don't really disagree with most of your points. It is not critical analysis of IMOT which bothered me--it was filtering all perceptions of the company through the American flag that did. Certainly, OBJECTIVE criticism is fine with me; I think clear thinking is very important.

To: johnlag who wrote (587)	3/18/1999 6:50:00 PM
From: Elllk	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 781

jlg Re: <<This company has made great efforts to stay away from being required to report to the SEC or make itself verifiable in any way shape or form. It's just not standard business practices. Why bother having a public listing on the OTC exchange when the management and founders would do much better as a private company?>> What are your reasons for saying the former? Going BB may be an easier route, and could be intended as a first step, but does not necessarily in itself constitute "great efforts to stay away from..." reporting. If you have some clear evidence of "great efforts...." to stay away from reporting, I would appreciate your posting it. I am not sure if I undertand your latter comment. Why would it apply to IMOTand not every other company that has gone public? ....in other words, why wouldn't IMOT have a chance to benefit from going public just as any other company that goes public might, and for all the same familiar reasons? Larry