SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Dutch Central Bank Sale Announcement Imminent? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bill Murphy who wrote (4512)3/18/1999 6:13:00 PM
From: IngotWeTrust  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 81973
 
Hi, Bill, sorry 4 being so unclear. Allow me 2 try again in their behalf, please.

1) Since GATA is a For Profit Corporation,
there are you and 2 others as officers. Is this correct?

2) What is the retainer fee being requested by the law firm you, as GATA are pretty set upon using?

3) Since you are exploring an anti-trust action and have noted many times on this thread how much cash settlement M&B won on their most visible previous action, is or is not this case being taken on a
contingency fee/split agreement?

4) If yes it is a contingency fee case, then why is there a retainer
fee requested in advance?

5) Assuming success in your actions, what is the current GATA plan for
splitting of their portion of the judgement award?

6) Since this is a private corporation, how do contributors secure financial statements?

As I tried to say in the previous post,
these are questions privately going around in e*mail.

I know you have nothing to hide. But the folks asking the above 6 questions, for whatever reason do NOT want to post these questions in public.

I'm sure we all would like to hear your question by question response.

Thank you, Bill.
Go GAT'em!!

O/49r