SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Monsanto Co. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Dan Spillane who wrote (1705)3/18/1999 5:12:00 PM
From: Anthony Wong  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2539
 
BBC: No test for GM food
Thursday, March 18, 1999 Published at 12:28 GMT

By BBC News Online Science Editor Dr David
Whitehouse

Food retailers will not be able to rely on tests alone to
ensure that their food contains no genetically-modified
(GM) ingredients. They will have to know exactly where
the foods ingredients came from.

This is because in some cases
there is no certain way of telling
whether processed food once
included ingredients that had been
genetically-modified.

If the raw, unprocessed crop is
available, or if the food has been only lightly processed,
then it is relatively easy to tell a GM plant or ingredient
from a normal one.

This is done with a standard DNA test called the
polymerase chain reaction (PCR) that looks for and
copies specific pieces of DNA.

But when foodstuffs are
processed the DNA they
contain becomes degraded.
Also substances that
interfere with the PCR
reaction can be introduced
during processing and
cooking.

The Laboratory of the
Government Chemist, an
independent UK body says
that extracting DNA from highly processed food in a form
suitable for reliable PCR testing can be "challenging and
unpredictable".

Last year LGC scientists warned food manufacturers and
retailers that they would be misleading customers if they
claimed that their highly processed products were 100%
free of GM ingredients based on tests alone.

The lack of a reliable test means that the only foolproof
way to ensure that a food is GM free is to find out
exactly what it is made from. This will require finding the
source of its basic ingredients and ensuring that they are
GM free.

If the food is made from soya or maize imported from the
United States this may be impossible as GM altered
soya and maize are mixed with unaltered crops.

As part of the requirement that GM foods are labelled the
UK government has issued a list of suppliers of certified
GM free foodstuffs.

news.bbc.co.uk



To: Dan Spillane who wrote (1705)3/18/1999 5:19:00 PM
From: Anthony Wong  Respond to of 2539
 
UK Politics - Fines back up GM labelling rules
Thursday, March 18, 1999 Published at 13:18 GMT

Restaurants will be fined if they do not label GM food

The UK Government is claiming to lead the way in
Europe by bringing in tough new regulations to force all
food-sellers to tell customers if items contain
genetically-modified ingredients.

Local authorities are being given powers to enforce a
European Union directive requiring labelling of all
products containing GM soya or maize.

These will be backed up by £5,000
fines for those who fail to provide full
information to consumers.

In a written parliamentary answer,
Food Safety Minister Jeff Rooker
said: "The government is determined
that consumers should be able to choose whether or not
to eat genetically-modified foods.

"This includes foods sold in
restaurants, cafes and takeaways and
not just that available in
supermarkets.

"The UK is the first member state in
Europe to take steps to ensure that
consumers eating out will have the same right to choose
whether or not to consume foods containing GM
ingredients as those buying from shops."

But speaking earlier, Mr Rooker insisted no risk existed
from eating the GM products already available in shops
and restaurants.

"With respect to genetic modification,
there is no health or scientific
evidence that has been put to peer
group testing by other scientists, that
give us any doubt about the safety of
those foods that are currently regulated on the market."

The minister stressed the law already required food
retailers to mark products containing GM ingredients.

"We're giving powers to local
authorities to enforce the
existing law, which requires
that genetically-modified
soya and maize in products
should be labelled."

But the inspection process
would apply to only
end-product ingredients, he
said, as derivatives could not
be found by testing.

Some campaigners feel the
regulations do not go far
enough.

Friends of the Earth said the new laws should include
GM-product derivatives, such as lecithin, a soya
by-product.

A spokesman for the group said: "If these ingredients are
excluded from the labelling laws it will mean consumers
will still be eating unlabelled food containing GM
ingredients, depriving them of an informed choice."

Several major supermarket chains,
including Sainsbury's and Marks and
Spencer, are removing all GM
ingredients from own-brand ranges.

In evidence last night to the
Commons science and technology committee, Professor
Janet Bainbridge, chairman of the government's advisory
committee on novel foods and processes, said GM foods
must be better labelled.

She urged a "major public awareness campaign to allow
informed choice".

But she added: "I have confidence in the technology and
the rigour of the regulatory process.

"Imposition of a ban on the cultivation or sale of GM
foods would achieve nothing except jeopardise the
competitiveness of UK industry.

"Despite emotive media coverage, there has never been
any recorded ill effect to human health resulting from
consumption of GM foods."

But Tory agriculture spokesman Tim Yeo said people
buying food had to understand the information given to
them.

"What we need is labelling regulations which give
consumer clear, simple and accurate information about
whether any food they buy in the shop contains any GM
ingredients and if it is, in what proportion.

"Without that information any new regulations about
labelling won't be worth very much."

news.bbc.co.uk