Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Tonto and Janice Teach Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ellen who wrote (27)	3/18/1999 8:19:00 PM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 302

Re: What's your term for the arrogant & patronizing person who wishes to re-assign a thread subject for their own purpose? How about... a "yEllen"?! - Jeff

To: Ellen who wrote (27)	3/19/1999 7:43:00 AM
From: tonto	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 302

Ellen, thank you for being so willing to be a poor example of posters. Your attempt is only negative, produces zero worth, and only shows how disruptive you are... Let's take a look at my post on the RMIL thread which disturbs you so much. As I am reviewing posts for some information I seek, I am compiling a series of posts which I may post someday, should I believe the thread will gain from this, instead of starting new pointless battles. The hope is to recognize early on where investors error, so that we may better recognize this, and hopefully make better positive decisions. As mistakes made here are being repeated by some of the same posters on other threads. and for ease of comparison, your post is copied: What's your term for the arrogant & patronizing person as referenced in the thread header, the first link (your post! #reply-8391450) who wishes to re-assign a thread subject for his own purpose? Wondering In Westport, please feel free to chime in with your term for this too!! Thanks! It is clear your bias once again limits your rational. You say the intent is to re-assign a thread subject for my own purpose? You once again are wrong. It is very clear that I qualify my statement by stating, "which I may post someday, should I believe the thread will gain from this, instead of starting new pointless battles. You could not help yourself and went for the ankles immediately. You decided I was going to re-assign the thread subject, when in fact, I recognized that because of posters such as yourself, the thread was not a site to post relevant RMIL information regarding factual warning signals that were ignored by investors which resulted in a tremendous loss in dollars. Your post regarding "nays" not communicating in a manner acceptable to you is noted, but is not close to being a solution. You are once again off the mark. The actual problem for investors is ignoring information which will severely affect their investment. It doesn't matter how it is delivered, what is important is for the information to be considered, no matter who provides the information, or how they provide it. Hopefully those providing information will be successful in catching one's attention, but, they have nothing to lose, as they normally have no dollars invested since they have paid attention to the factual information available and not ignored. Thanks again Ellen, best of luck to you. I hope you will become a contributor. And Ellen, I love you.