Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Scumbria who wrote (52911)	3/18/1999 11:44:00 PM
From: Elmer	Respond to of 1574589

Re: "the huge differential between Xeon shipping speeds and their demo (250 Mhz) clearly indicates that Intel was up to mischief." More proof of your bias. Why do you call it mischief unless you think they have some sinister plan? Looks like a process generation to me. Re: "every ounce of engineering sense in me says that the Intel 800MHz/1GHz demos were contrived." Think hard now Scumbria. Why would Intel demo an 800Mhz system weeks after they had already demoed a 1000Mhz system??????? At what stage of development do you think Intel's .18u process is? Do you think Intel has generated any .18u PIII material? If so, should they show it? How fast do you think they could get a demo to run? Think hard now Scumbria. EP