SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : VLSI Technology - Waiting for good news from NASDAQ !!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: OldAIMGuy who wrote (5846)3/19/1999 10:46:00 AM
From: lifeisgood  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 6565
 
Tom,

Thanks for the informative post. I've been following VLSI for some time too and agree that it has long been undervalued.

I too bought DIGI at the time it was barely trading above book (I believe it got close to 13.5 or so). It too turned out to be a great investment. Finding companies who consistently turn profits and trade at or below book (e.g., digi,vlsi) is indeed a profitable enterprise. The tough part is putting my hard-earned money on the table when everyone else is bailing out. Good DD helps and so does talking to knowledgable others (e.g., vlsi thread).

LIG



To: OldAIMGuy who wrote (5846)3/19/1999 11:01:00 AM
From: Linda Kaplan  Respond to of 6565
 
Super post, Tom. Thanks. --Linda



To: OldAIMGuy who wrote (5846)3/19/1999 11:04:00 AM
From: Mark Brophy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 6565
 
The IPO was overpriced.

So are most others. Anybody who regularly buys IPOs and holds them for 16 years is a fool. Even if we assume that VLSI is worth 39, you would've only tripled your money in 16 years. You would've done better with T-bills. Paying 4x BV is too much for most companies.

The performance of VLSI is pretty good. Most of the other 1983 IPOs are bankrupt or were bought out at a loss.