Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : ABER RESOURCES -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: The Vet who wrote (1108)	3/19/1999 2:16:00 PM
From: teevee	Respond to of 2006

The Vet, It appears, that Aber's story is incomplete...time is of the essence. Know any good legal firms who could take on a shareholder's class action for loses incurred by breach of fiduciary responsibility and duty to shareholders?

To: The Vet who wrote (1108)	3/19/1999 3:33:00 PM
From: Gord Bolton	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2006

" In December 1998, when the 1999 budget was discussed and adopted by Aber and the project operator at a Joint Venture Management Committee meeting, Aber informed the operator that Aber would pay its share of the budget and participate in the program, including the bulk sampling of a diamond-bearing dyke at Snap Lake. In numerous discussions since then, Aber has continued to inform the operator of Aber's participation in the program." We sure enough are reading the same thing. You will note the specific choice of language in the Aber NR. Rather than clearly saying that; 1) Aber notified by letter of X date that Aber had elected to put up $3.8 million dollars and participate in the Program. 2) Aber did not notify Winspear of their intention to participate. Aber have chosen to talk about something else and sue Winspear after the exploration program for what they could have had before by proper notice and sending cash. Aber has paper now, why did they have none before? What was Aber waiting for?