Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Fonix:Voice Recognition Product (FONX) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dr. Bob who wrote (2196)	3/19/1999 2:56:00 PM
From: Hunter Trout	Respond to of 3347

Bob, I don't dispute any of your comments and I stand by my opinion of the other board. DSPetry, thanks for the link. HT

To: Dr. Bob who wrote (2196)	3/19/1999 6:08:00 PM
From: Mitchell D. Wilcox	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3347

I've been following this story for at least the last three years and I'm surprised to say the least that it has turned out this way. Just for the record, I haven't owned the stock for at least the last year. The story is just proof that you can't bank on the Board of any company regardless of who is on it. My early research of the Board members gave me confidence that they were good people. Actions definitely speak louder than words and it just goes to show that in most cases you just really don't know anymore. Now I'm sure there could be more to the story but with the knowledge I have now I am extremely disappointed in those who run this company. "the company plans to pay Stephen Studdert $600,000" - What a slap in the face! I hope he can sleep at night. I'll end with the question, "Does anybody out there really believe Fonix when they say their confident that they can satisfy the Nasdaq?" If so, why? Mitch