To: Jock Hutchinson who wrote (17461 ) 3/19/1999 10:07:00 PM From: patrick tang Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 25814
Much thanks for the info Jock. I still don't quite understand the shorting before the convertible part, but then it wouldn't be the first or last time I can't understand something. I believe that on Tuesday, a $1.50 down day, the volume was high but only 2.5M shares. On Wed., it was a 7M share day, way beyond covering any shorts the few days before it. So.... Would also believe that on that big up day, the last of the LSI shorts took their cue and exited their positions. Can't see how the I/O chip is more complicated than the 10M transistor CPU + graphic chip, but as long as LSI can get more money for the new chip as well as retain the business for the old one, still a positive I guess. Still don't agree with the SEEQ purchase, 'cause I think they should be able to tape out those products from their IP library. Just tape them out as stand alone products instead of cells. But .... guess we'll have to trust them to know what they are doing. I like their aggressiveness, going to go up head to head with Intel and TI. But at their size, besides continuing to dominate their nitches like storage, they will have to attack existing large markets to grow. If they will just do a good job of it, they will probably get bought out a couple of years later at a good price (by whom, I wouldn't know). If they do an excellent job and actually carve out a good part of the business for themselves, the stock will be something to hold and behold! Hope it is the latter. I like their focus - quite unlike Halla at NSM. That re-org was perfect. Good management. I know a lot of people will crunch when I say this, but it does not hurt for the stock to drop to $11 last Oct. Those low price stock options should lock a lot of the engineers in place for the next four years. patrick