Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Winspear Resources -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mr. Oil who wrote (16146)	3/19/1999 10:30:00 PM
From: John Paquet	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 26850

Ray;Sudhir may break the Ontario Company Act....... Sudhir Man Issue continue.... It is clear in his Company disclaimer "No statement or express of opinion. or any other matter herein, directly, or indirectly, is an offer, solicitation, or recommendation to buy or sell any security mentioned. " WSP is the company he mentioned and still mentions in his newsletter. And Sudhir did recomend sevearl times to buy or sell wsp security. In order words, his company disclaimer becomes invalid under this circumstance. Also, according the Term of Use of SI, the Ontario Company ACTs contains the Term of Use of SI, in other words, Sudhir Man played that double agent game will fail and have to pay the price because the TERM of USE of SI is contained within that the Ontarion Company ACTs. Ontario residents or any Canadian residents who lost money playing the wsp may file civil suits againt our Sudhir Man and claimed his misconduct by breaking his own discliamer of his company. If a person bought 10,000 shares on January 4, 1999, at $4.50 and he took losses at $3.00 he lost $$1.50 X10,000= $15,000 one may claim this losses due to our Sudhir Man broke the Ontario Company ACTs. You see. Sudhir Man was thinking he could get away through his double agent scheme SI talks as cover up you see. But he forget that he is responsible for that Onatirio Comany ACTS as the TERM of USE of SI is contained in that ACT. I am not kidding at all. Any WAY, this SI talks, We are learning every day. But work as double agent is critically dangerous at very greatest risk. But on the other side of the coin, he has been enjoying greatest rewards and profits. Ray, as you said, let's enjoy SI talks. John Paquet

To: Mr. Oil who wrote (16146)	3/19/1999 11:02:00 PM
From: John Paquet	Respond to of 26850

Ray; I should add details of his company disclaimer attached to my last posts. That is it as follows: "The publisher is not a registered investment advisor. Nor statement, or expression of opinion , or any other matter herein, directly or indirectly, is an offer, solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell any securities mentioned." The publisher is The resource Indicator owned by Surhir Khanna and edited by the person Sudhir Khanna. Since he is not a registered investment advisor, he is not qualified in any form of advising or recommending to buy or sell any securities that he mentioned. That is our WSP. Butin this SI talks he did recommend and advise buy or sell security he mentioned which breaks the disclaimer. That is he indeed violated this disclaimer through this SI talks as double agent. He is serious in trouble that Is I am saying. And I am not kidding at all. For this simple reasons, I hardly or I did not see any newsletter company or editor recommends to buy or sell securities. John Paquet