Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

SI - Site Forums : Silicon Investor - Welcome New SI Members! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: David Lawrence who wrote (4798)	3/20/1999 12:14:00 AM
From: Cheeky Kid	Respond to of 32871

Maybe the kid is pretty good at picking stocks and the big boys are looking pretty bad <g> LOL

To: David Lawrence who wrote (4798)	3/20/1999 12:35:00 AM
From: Tom Swift	Respond to of 32871

Actually, I do understand plain English. The spirit of the TOU clearly includes the idea of no minors. The letter of the law gives SI complete leeway in individual cases. My question is, why are they deviating from the spirit of the TOU in Daniel's case? I am an adult and have paid good money to be in a place where I can discuss stocks and point out scams without having to deal with people that cannot legally trade on the stock market.