SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Winspear Resources -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: John Paquet who wrote (16168)3/20/1999 12:46:00 PM
From: Steelguy  Respond to of 26850
 
>>As I stated clearly in #reply-8423535. I suppose that you should read 10 times before you make further comments. My statement is clear.<<

Good afternoon John,
as you mentioned last night....you don't want to circle around this issue without an ending. I agree, so I will continue.
This last post is sounding defensive, I am sorry I have put you into this mood. two posts ago to me you say thank you to me for the " kind " advice.....my next post you say..." well said ".....NOW you say I should read your post 10 times before making any further comments. YIKES! I've touched a nerve haven't I?
There is no need to read this latest post you link 10 times as that is not the post in question. It is the dialogue in the other 3 or so posts where you are defaming Sudhir's character that we are discussing. I will spend some time later today and link all of your sladerous remarks together about Sudhir so we can debate them together...I know you enjoy SI debates and talks.

Of course, an apology to Sudhir would probably suffice to show that you agree you have defamed his character....I am sure he would not pursue any action. And hey, he probably won't anyway right???

As you say John this is SI talks and purely for entertainment purposes...........you should have kept it that way. Slander and defamation of a public figure's reputation is not entertainment, it's criminal.

take care.

sg