Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : DGIV-A-HOLICS...FAMILY CHIT CHAT ONLY!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ronaldo who wrote (40949)	3/20/1999 12:03:00 PM
From: Little Engine	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 50264

<<<Basically L.E. has been out to prove that DGIV was a scam.>>> Nope, sorry. I've never said such a thing, and I don't know why you persist on spreading such a lie. Another lie: suggestion that this is some "part time job" of mine. Apparently you don't read my posts very carefully. But I am used to hearing what I am "actually" doing... which always comes as quite a surprise to me. I happen to believe people who "only read the posts at SI but cannot pm" have brains, and can see what is actually going on with this stock without your help. I've asked you in the past to tell everyone where and when I said that DGIV was a scam, but you cannot, since I never did such a thing. I'm only here to discuss the stock, not to provide inspirational stories, discuss football, dental patterns, etc. If people want to do that, fine, that is their right. But to attack someone for wanting to intelligently discuss the stock reeks of having something to hide. Of course, you have bought into Roger Templeton's company line of a "shorting conspiracy." Apparently he is your "main source of inspiration"... If there was something coming from DGIV besides promises, I'd note that. A year ago, they said that financials were coming "real soon", now we have an e-mail from Roger Templeton (an insider who sold his DGIV stock before it really tanked... For any "lurkers" who you profess to be concerned about, here is the link: biz.yahoo.com ) saying the same thing now. Six months from now you will likely be hearing it again. Shorting conspiracy, financials coming soon, contracts eventually, blah, blah, blah. The "dog ate them" excuse on the financials will only work so long. Is it any wonder some of the "true believers" are selling? You blame me for this company's fate more than the management? Please explain your "clearing of positions" among MM's theory. So is it your contention that the MM's sat around Friday deliberately trying not to make any money? Buying blocks of stock and refusing to sell it for more than three cents more? Ummm, okay. Are you saying the MM's have no inventory now? Admitting the "shorting conspiracy" is over and proclaiming the stock will take off like a rocket now? I'm really curious. I don't work for the Stock Detective or care much about it. They provided people with some good research and information, and I don't see anything wrong with that. I once quoted a survey here from a guy I interviewed with once - an absolute jerk. It was still good information -- why throw it out just because I loathe him? You aren't my favorite person here, either. But if you can come up with any solid evidence that DGIV is making any money, or has any IP contracts, I'm listening. And still waiting to see it.

To: Ronaldo who wrote (40949)	3/20/1999 3:40:00 PM
From: paulmcg0	Respond to of 50264

[[It is also notable that neither L.E. or Playground Paul, when confronted with the corrupt ways of Stock Detective, had anything to say.]] This is another example of your lies. I posted a response some time ago on another thread at Message 8322268 My suspicion, based on the threads that were spammed by the original poster "witeout" with that message about Kevin is that it was posted by stock promoter Steve Samblis or one of his associates, in an attempt to discredit Kevin. You will also notice that SI removed the posts slandering Kevin from most of the threads where they appeared.