SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Pharma News Only (pfe,mrk,wla, sgp, ahp, bmy, lly) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Anthony Wong who wrote (1525)3/21/1999 2:34:00 PM
From: Anthony Wong  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1722
 
Big drug companies setting up shop in area

By Ronald Rosenberg, Globe Staff, 03/21/99

ome of the world's major pharmaceutical firms are quietly invading
Massachusetts.

For years, big drug companies like Pfizer Inc. and Merck & Co. have
stuck to tried-and-true ways for discovering new drugs, slow and
expensive processes that often involve huge research staffs. But several
biotech firms concentrated in Massachusetts and California have been
outpacing the drug companies in developing promising drugs, using
advanced techniques aided by computer modeling and genetics research.

After years of licensing drugs created with this technology, the big
companies are now adopting the latest drug discovery strategies
themselves. As a result, from Cambridge to Worcester, the firms are
building research outposts to tap the Boston area's scientific pool and
vaunted medical establishment.

''What we are seeing with the influx of large pharmaceutical companies is
something we never envisioned 10 or 15 years ago,'' said Joseph J.
Donovan, director of Emerging Technology Development in the state's
office of business development.

Other observers say the arrival of big drug companies here was only a
matter of time. ''They're coming here because Boston combines university
research and the biotechnology industry with advanced medicine coming
out of hospitals,'' said Steven Holtzman, Millennium Pharmaceutical's chief
business officer. ''So there is a competitive advantage for the
pharmaceutical industry to having a part of its research enterprise here.''

In November, Pfizer opened its Discovery Technology Center in a former
biotech laboratory near the Massachusetts Institute of Technology campus.
The center, which now has a staff of about 15 scientists and will add
another 100 during the next two years, evaluates drug discovery
technologies, according to John LaMattina, senior vice president of
worldwide operations at Pfizer Central Research in Groton, Conn.
Eventually, the center will share its results with Pfizer labs worldwide.

LaMattina said Cambridge was a ''natural setting to try out new
therapeutical and technological approaches'' because of its high
concentration of ''world-class scientific institutions.''

Similarly, Merck is looking to put down roots in Boston in its quest for
250,000 square feet of research space in the Fenway, not far from the
Longwood medical area.

The most ambitious project, however, is being planned by Amgen Inc., one
of the world's largest drug and biotech companies, based in Thousand
Oaks, Calif. Amgen plans to break ground in September for an eight-story,
285,000-square-foot research facility in Kendall Square, next to Genzyme
Corp. in Cambridge.

The company has wanted to build an East Coast research center since
1993, when it signed a major research and technology agreement with
MIT. But the building project was halted when Amgen acquired a large
biotech company in Boulder, Colo., where it already had a research and
development lab.

David Kaye, an Amgen spokesman, said the company decided to finally
come to Cambridge because of the huge scientific research talent pool in
Greater Boston, the proximity to MIT, and access to biotech partners such
as Praecis Pharmaceuticals Inc.

Earlier this month, Amgen said it will spend $100 million this year to
complete the testing and development of a Praecis drug to treat prostate
cancer. ''We recognize not every valued scientist wants to move to
Thousand Oaks, Calif., so we're going to the Boston area,'' Kaye said.

Pharmaceutical companies face major challenges in discovering
blockbuster drugs over the next 10 years. Genetic engineering - the
technology used to alter the genetic material of living cells to produce new
substances - is at the cornerstone of a revolution in developing drugs.

Many pharmaceutical giants are focusing on the links between genes and
diseases using nontraditional drug discovery methods. The goal is to create
drugs with few side effects to treat illnesses for which there are no effective
medications.

Researchers estimate that in the next decade, genomics, which is the study
of the genetic code, will increase the number of compounds from which
drugs evolve from 500 today to between 3,000 and 10,000, according to
a recent study for the pharmaceutical industry by Boston Consulting Group.

In coming to Massachusetts, the cash-rich drug companies are seeking to
improve their ability to find the compounds that will lead to new drugs -
and to forge even stronger ties with the biotech firms that have become
leaders in genetic research.

About one-third of drugs marketed by the major pharmaceutical
companies are the products of compounds licensed from biotech firms,
according to the BCG study. Currently, biotech companies nationwide
have isolated approximately 150 compounds that could generate 8 to 12
new government-approved drugs a year until 2003 and account for
hundreds of millions of dollars in annual sales for each drug, the study
states.

For Pfizer, which spends $2 billion a year on drug research, the decision to
expand to Cambridge was simply a way to find new methods of capturing
these drugs.

''We wanted to get away from the tyranny of our own success,'' said Alan
R. Proctor, head of Pfizer's Discovery Center. ''We do very well
discovering drugs, but we needed a place to try new things away from our
main research center and to tap a new environment with new ideas. We
know that if we don't change our ways, we'll fall behind and be out of
business.''

This story ran on page C01 of the Boston Globe on 03/21/99.
© Copyright 1999 Globe Newspaper Company.

boston.com



To: Anthony Wong who wrote (1525)3/21/1999 2:43:00 PM
From: Anthony Wong  Respond to of 1722
 
Key to Female Viagra Seems a Brain Teaser
By MARLENE CIMONS, Times Staff Writer
Sunday, March 21, 1999

W ASHINGTON--Elizabeth Belt
remembers holding the two pale-blue,
diamond-shaped pills in the palm of her hand
before swallowing them and thinking: "Please
God, let this work."

The 35-year-old Richmond, Ind., woman has been desperately
unhappy for years over the sexual problems she has suffered since
undergoing routine gynecological surgery when she was 19.

Belt now pins her hopes on Viagra, the hot-selling impotence pill
for men. Although the first published study of Viagra in women
proved less dramatic than anticipated, the sizzling market it created
among men has sent researchers and drug companies racing to find
its female equivalent.

"The world is finally coming around for women," said Dr.
Jennifer Berman, a urologist who runs the Women's Sexual Health
Clinic at Boston University with her sister, Laura Berman, a
psychotherapist.

But the search for a female Viagra has led researchers to an
important conclusion: The key to improving sexual function in
women may lie in stimulating the libido. For women, scientists are
finding, the most important organ for sexual function may be the
brain.

"Viagra is really, literally, a functionally acting drug--it does
something mechanically," said Roland Gerritsen van der Hoop, vice
president of clinical operations for Solvay Pharmaceuticals in
Atlanta, one of the companies testing a libido-enhancing drug for
women. "It won't work if desire isn't there."

Dr. Steven A. Kaplan, a urologist at New York Presbyterian
Hospital who conducted the first published study of Viagra in
women, agreed that enhancing desire could be more important for
women than increasing blood flow to the primary sex organs.

"Many women define sexual pleasure as
arousal without orgasm and some disassociate
desire and arousal from the act of intercourse," Kaplan said.

The winning drug could produce an enormous windfall. Viagra,
which Pfizer Pharmaceuticals put on the market last spring, enjoyed
$788 million in sales last year. The market for women may be even
more promising. A recently released study found that four of every
10 American women are having problems in the bedroom.

One libido-enhancing drug currently being tested in clinical trials
among women is a chemical called apomorphine, which stimulates
the brain.

It is a pill that will be sold under the name Uprima and it has
already been studied--and judged effective--for increasing men's
sexual desire. The company plans to seek Food and Drug
Administration approval for men later this year. It could take several
additional years before it is approved for women.

Another drug that could win the race for a female Viagra has
been on the market for 35 years.

The hormonal combination known as Estratest, made by Solvay
Pharmaceuticals, is a mixture of estrogen and male androgens used
to treat symptoms of menopause. Women taking it have reported a
most pleasurable side effect: an increase in sexual desire.

Kaplan's Viagra study, which was conducted on 30
post-menopausal women, showed that only about a quarter of the
women experienced significant changes. The results were
disappointing to some, but Kaplan noted that larger studies on other
groups of women are needed before any conclusions about Viagra
in women can be made. In the meantime, he said, improvement was
"certainly significant in those women."

Pfizer has launched a study of the drug in
several hundred European women.

And some clinics are giving Viagra to women already. The
Bermans have been treating sexually dysfunctional women in their
Boston clinic with a combination of approaches, including Viagra.
They have found that Viagra seems to work best in certain women
and not at all in others.

"The women who benefit most are women who were able to
become aroused before," Laura Berman said. "If they have never
been able to become aroused or have an orgasm, Viagra is not
extremely useful. It's not a libido pill. It's not something that
enhances desire."

For Elizabeth Belt, who is engaged to be married, the trouble
started 16 years ago after a routine dilation and curettage, a
procedure involving scraping the walls of the uterus, after a
miscarriage.

But the surgery apparently caused nerve damage within her
vagina, causing her to lose all sensation there. In recent years, she
began to experience a similar numbness in other genital areas. She
was evaluated at the Bermans' Boston clinic in February. After
taking Viagra, she said, sensation has started to return.

"I'm hopeful now," she said. "Before, I didn't have any hope at
all. I just thought, 'I'm going to be like this forever.' "

Copyright 1999 Los Angeles Times. All Rights Reserved

latimes.com



To: Anthony Wong who wrote (1525)3/22/1999 9:26:00 PM
From: Delfino R Zavala  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1722
 
Anthony

Thanks for your prompt response.

Del Z