Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Dutch Central Bank Sale Announcement Imminent? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill Murphy who wrote (4651)	3/21/1999 10:12:00 AM
From: IngotWeTrust	Respond to of 82007

held up t'mirror 2 Bill's face 2X now. BILL: U R t'NEGATIVE looking back. Not I! MIRROR ONEI told one of YOUR subscribers (le cafe) who was trying to siphon off your subscribers and make them subscribers of Armstrong's rag by posting to me in a le cafe thread, that YOU were too early for your call for a gold rally several months ago, and you reamed me outwith a post hole auger. AND you did it publically, HERE on SI. PLUS you didn't have the balls to publically apologize. That was before Christmas, you twerp! AND I WAS RIGHT you mealy mouthed goldbug-come-lately!!! GOLD HASN'T RALLIED! You're looking like the early fool, not Greenspan, and certainly NOT ME! SECONDLY: I'm holding up this accountability mirror in behalf of 6, count them and drool sucker!!!! 6 people/corporations who would like to put some serious bucks into your campaign...folks I've talked and been emailed by since your and my Greenspan private phone chat!!! WELCOME TO THE BIG LEAGUES, BOOOOOYYY: Not everyone does biz face to face, especially until an organization is legit and accountable. As far as you not being a detail man?<--your words, not mine) THAT'S WHAT SANK David Walsh's BRE-X!!!* AND NOW IT'S SINKING YOU before you even get out of the huddle: $28,000 is nothing but buggers on a used kleenex compared to what you kind of moola you need. Here's the MIRROR again, pal...take a long deeeeeeeep look at what is staring back at you, not at who is holding up the mirror!!! The mirror Questions are: (again for the 4th MIRROR time:) 1) Since GATA is a For Profit Corporation, there are you and 2 others as officers. Is this correct? Answered 3/18/99: GATA is a "Not-For-Profit" organization. Answered 3/19/99: In reply to Darleen (see above) this appears to not be the correct answer, so this is still unanswered by a yes or a no. Writes: Pete S 3/20/99: "GATA is a 'not for profit' but I don't know any details." 2) What is the retainer fee being requested by the law firm you, as GATA are pretty set upon using? 3) Since you are exploring an anti-trust action --and have noted many times on this thread how much cash settlement M&B won on their most visible previous action-- is or is not this case being taken on a contingency fee/split agreement? 4) If yes it is a contingency fee case, then why is there a retainer fee requested in advance? 5) Assuming success in your actions, what is the current GATA plan for splitting of their portion of the judgement award? 6) Since this is a private, for profit corporation, how do contributors secure timely, audited financial statements? Partial Answer/extrapolation: this is now declared to be a "Not for Profit" as of 3/18/99. ººº As such, there are legit avenues, governed by the state of Delaware, and the particular IRS organizational code, for GATA contributors or any interested party who wishes a look into the books on a timely manner a means to do so. ººº Readers: Please refer to retraction/modification under point one. Delaware filing structure is back in the non-disclosed category, and remains to be answered. *The only "negative here" is you not answering public questions* Questions from the very people you are publically soliciting gold funds from. You're still wanting everyone to watch where you point the "birdie" instead of seeing the details/"droppings" you're leaving all over everwhere! O/49r