SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: JGoren who wrote (24560)3/21/1999 10:12:00 AM
From: Dave  Respond to of 152472
 
JGoren, all:

RE: CDMA security

Here is a post from Clark...

Message 8383583

Michael - I thought that the short code/ long code dance along with some other stuff did encrypt CDMA?

The equivalents to the short codes and long codes in a military system would indeed be used to encrypt the system. But in CDMAOne there are two things that prevent it from being used as encryption:

1) The code sequence generation method is publicly known.

2) The sequence is only about 40 bits long. As has been shown many times, this is not long enough to prevent cracking pretty easily (not that cracking is even needed given item #1).


Note that the big advantage to CDMA is its interference resistance, but this isn't really needed in point-to-point communications without much interference from neighbors, and this is the probable environment of the Cinecomm system.

Clark


hope this helps,

dave



To: JGoren who wrote (24560)3/21/1999 10:43:00 AM
From: Eric L  Respond to of 152472
 
JG,

Your China post referred to GSM, not analog. CDMA techs might have a lively debate with the GSM techs on this subject, but methinks there would not be a clear winner.

- Eric -