To: SnakeInATuxedo who wrote (9831 ) 3/22/1999 12:11:00 AM From: d:oug Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 14226
C. Lawrence Perkins, before I rain on top of your parade could you please enlighten me with some needed clearification so I will understand better. Richard calls you 'The Only', to mean what please ? The creator of the MGAU Thread is a CL who has not posted for year(s), but has updated the thread's header recently for the marble connection. But now to the elements of nature, where one can only adapt not control. I bet that soon Mike will depart with a hero's send off, and Mr. Jensen and Mr. Twifford will regain control of GPGI. I know Mr. Jensen is the President, and Mr. Twifford may or may not be an employee of GPGI, but has a very long term and "GPGI" close relationship. Considering that the shareholders here will soon obtain the return on their investments always wanted, abide long long overdue, would it not make sence to not only let GPGI continue the progress being made, but to only let an understanding be reconized that the possible conflicts with the J&T Cat and those shares and who is right and wrong be put on hold, as if frozen in time for now, with no one claiming lost or gain, and thusly let GPGI continue on its path of good recovery and success. Sometimes these matters can be resolved not in a legal court, but off-line to everyones satisfaction. To continue to post public for the shares to be returned, when if they have not yet been returned means that J and T have a different way to handle this, then if continued on this thread in the public posts might lead new potential investors, or even possible big money to come into GPGI, from not doing so. Stability and peace will not be displayed this way for new lookers to see. They might see a legal challenge to GPGI thru shareholders as a possible in the future, and thus back away. Off line and Private posts and e-mail for the J&T Cat and shares issue. Will leave me out in the cold for updates, but I don't count. It goes without saying, but your post that this is a reply to is another work of visual art. Chuca tried to do as you do, doing posts this way, but came up short. Chuca has the words, but can't sence the flow angle. Doug