Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Angel D who wrote (54272)	3/21/1999 2:02:00 PM
From: TideGlider	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 55532

Angel: Are you trying to deny what has been presented. I feel you have always been a gentleman and always looked out for what was correct. Let me clue ya in. There is nothing you are going to get from RMIL. Unless ya'll get savy...and go after what is called "diversion"....and Breton has left all the clues.. TG

To: Angel D who wrote (54272)	3/21/1999 2:22:00 PM
From: Janice Shell	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 55532

but then maybe you feel that you're at your best and most effective from a negative and insulting standpoint. Baiting one's opponents is an honorable and often effective way of obtaining information. You may not like that, but Pugs, for example, can easily be goaded into indiscretions. Even so, I'm rarely the first to start in with insults, and I'm careful not to go too far, despite what Cindy so amusingly considers my "cyberdominatrix brutality". Each of us does what he feels is best. Nonetheless, I love you. And we love yEllen.

To: Angel D who wrote (54272)	3/21/1999 5:02:00 PM
From: Ellen	Respond to of 55532

You see. I really don't want to argue or exchange insults with you. You were right and I lost money. It would be nice. of course, if you could somehow adopt a positive attitude regarding how to assist in making the perpetrators pay, but then maybe you feel that you're at your best and most effective from a negative and insulting standpoint. I second that - everything you said.

To: Angel D who wrote (54272)	3/21/1999 7:02:00 PM
From: s martin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

>>I guess that I'd have to agree with you on that. In retrospect, from a "longs" point of view, there never was any "substantive" information to be posted. That is, unless, one considers "I just got off the phone with GM (or RB or Lori or whoever) and found out that the money is due any day, the plants are only temporarily shut down for maintenance, there are new contracts in the works and the boat is booking cruises, etc." to be substantive. << I guess the problem I have in understanding the yay position is... surely some of you checked out some of the information. When you found you were being lied to.....what kept you silent on the matter? I put Riley and Pugs in a separate category from the other yays. I think they definitely knew that things were not as advertised, yet they kept everyone hanging in by refusing to admit the truth. I think many yays simply assumed that Riley had his money in the pot and that he wouldn't put himself on the line unless he knew something good could come of all this. I also think many yays thought there really was a cavalry who had supported this crusade by investing lots of their own money. As it turns out this was a house of cards with nothing to hold it up. I think the halt was a relief to the company because it was their only way out of the mess. The halt has relieved them of the responsibility of making those filings which, if honest, would have had to reveal the payoffs and the closed facilities. It's also my opinion that Riley was no more duped than the man in the moon. I believe ptm when he said that Riley was a part of the scheme by Zapara/marketmakers/brokers/M & B to inflate the price for their personal gain not to gain a listing on AMEX, that was hog wash, they knew they weren't manufacturing clothing. I'm not looking for an "uncle" from you. I think what I'd like to know is whether you've bought into his scenario ?