Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : THNS - Technest Holdings (Prev. FNTN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Radim Parchansky who wrote (11534)	3/22/1999 9:41:00 AM
From: watcher	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 15313

Radim. Why don't you prove my facts wrong. Ask MS to explain: 1. What happened to the McGraw Hill deal? 2. Provide us details about the source of their 1998 revenues. Is this from Intranet, or is it gross sales on long distance? 3. Why did he keep saying even in Dec. that they were on target with sales? 4. Where are the Form 4's? These points are not fabricated as much as you would like people to think they are. They come from straight from the records. While you're at it, ask him if all that insider stock has lock up agreements. Radim, you keep asking about my motives for sticking with this piece of crap, let me ask you this. As you point out, there are many deals out there. Why do YOU stick so dedicated to ONE? This is your chance to make a fool out of me. Take your best shot.

To: Radim Parchansky who wrote (11534)	3/23/1999 7:41:00 AM
From: JW@KSC	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 15313

Obviously there is a motive here! All, May I take a few minutes of your time? I began my SI Quest on Christmas 1995 in the Amati Thread. During the next two years I dealt with Bashers on the thread some of which had multiple heads (2 or 3 screen names). They spun their web in many ways,using no hard facts to backup their spiel, talking in circles bringing up the same points, when confronted, even after their points have been explained. They usually suck in one or more people on the thread with their BS, and the next thing you know you have thread members going at each others throats thus providing camouflage to the Basher(s), which in turn allows him (them) to continue weaving the web and making life hell on those who have a valid interest in the company. Please don't get me wrong, I'm all for balanced input, for without which it is easy for those who do tend to hype, to lead newbies and lurkers down the garden path. But when there is an obvious motive behind certain posters who spell out doom and gloom, it should be brought out in the open. In those early days of SI we had a webmistress who took the time to read the information we provided showing the bashers for who they are, and she took the appropriate measures. A few were removed from SI, multiple heads were decapitated, and life once again became pleasant. If you, yes you, had someone on your thread who's only posts were to bash, and in their demented mind were trying to save you all from losing your money, and in the past 5 months had only posted to One SI Thread, yours (???) during those 5 months, (quite possibly 7 months from their signup to SI) would you think this person had an anterior motive? I'm not in a finger pointing mood this am. So my fellow FNTN Longs, start clicking on obvious thread members names and check their profiles and posts for the past 5 months. Perhaps read the earliest "5" or 7 posts you can find, and you may find someone who only posts to FNTN and talks in circles. Many thanks to those who have provided valuable information, you all know who you are ( I do ) and a tip of the hat to WIZ for his most recent yet few and far between posts. It would appear to me that there is a lot of common sense in his recent viewpoints. Thanks for your time, JW@KSC