To: James Simonick who wrote (11748 ) 3/21/1999 8:25:00 PM From: The Flying Crane Read Replies (1) | Respond to
Hi everyone:may be coming this way. While it is a good thing that we are planning ahead on how to approach them, I like to point out that we should not be so over-zealous that even innocent bystanders (new investors) get slaughtered for asking a valid and skeptical question. risk we are taking. But the new investors do not have that luxury of past discussions that were going on here before. So, sometimes their skeptical questions can be taken as bashing when all they want to do is to find out more. Therefore, before we start labeling every new poster with a skeptical question as basher, let's try to be cordial and provide them with facts and our own prediction as best as we can. IF we are to become very defensive just because the questions do not sound right, then we are no difference than a bunch of sheep who refuse to accept the current condition of our risky investment. Don't forget that PNLK is still residing in the land of OTC-BB and will be scrutinized by many new comers with load of money. Most new comers will be hesitated to throw money into a farm when they see all the sheep are blind to the potholes on the landscape. Yes, despite the great outlook that we can predict with all the blocks that are in place, we cannot ignore the fact that there are still many potholes and abyss that a careless management can fall right into. There is still a whole lot of risk out there!risk involved. A balanced picture automatically negates any attempt as 'hyping' due to excessive enthusiasm. Yes, we must also control our excessive exuberance if we can . Yet, we are all emotional human beings, so I do not expect the "if we can" to hold especially if the news is a ball-breaking news.To Each His Own .
