Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Short Term Picks From the 'Whiz' Kid -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Daniel Miller who wrote (5844)	3/22/1999 7:56:00 AM
From: Retired41	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 9115

Daniel you have got to start being a businessman. Stating that ABFG is OK even with a bad CEO is like saying a building is fine with a bad foundation. The CEO is not mining the gems in Madasgar, that's for sure because IMO it is highly unlikely that anyone is mining gems as there are no such operations to be found in Madasgar. Of course this could be some super secret discovery on a small island that only this small time _- insurance guy (I believe that's what I read he did) in Boca knows about. Second building a web site has nothing to do with making money. Bottom line if the CEO is bad, and you admit it, why on earth would you think recommending the stock is anything but stupid. Ignorance is out of the question as you have been told many times, and I presume have seen, what happens when you have a bad CEO. Does Sunbeam or Cendant ring a bell to you? Even with fully reporting NYSE listed companies their CEOs (with a much better track record than ABFG's) directed plain and simple accounting fabrications that ran for years before discovery. This was done at companies that are MUCH larger and spread out than ABFG. My meaning here is that fabrications at ABFG will remain secret much longer as they are a small central group. The smaller the groud the tighter the control, and the more chance for fraud going undiscovered. Anyone who buys this pick on Daniel's advice discounting the fact that there is ABSOLUTELY no evidence to suggest that this is a legitimate company and MUCH evidence to suggest that it isn't needs to either have their head examined, or their gambling addiction treated. With that said I am going to wait and watch. If the ignorant lambs on this thread buy it I will, as I did on IMOT, and tried to do on ORTH, short every last share I can of this. But you all have to bid it up over $2 to help make it worth my while. OK?