SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bobby Yellin who wrote (30442)3/22/1999 11:22:00 AM
From: Alan Whirlwind  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 116779
 
I tried a few of the names here on www.dogpile.com, a search engine of search engines, and most of the links I came up with were German. None were Isreaeli. So I would say anti-German rather than anti-semitic.



To: Bobby Yellin who wrote (30442)3/22/1999 12:22:00 PM
From: long-gone  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 116779
 
'Another view of the Fed. ownership issue:
...Who Owns the Federal Reserve Bank of New York?

Each of the twelve Federal Reserve Banks is organized into a
corporation whose shares are sold to the commercial banks and
thrifts operating within the Bank's district. Shareholders elect six
of the nine the board of directors for their regional Federal Reserve
Bank as well as its president. Mullins reported that the top eight
stockholders of the New York Fed were, in order from largest to
smallest as of 1983, Citibank, Chase Manhatten, Morgan Guaranty
Trust, Chemical Bank, Manufacturers Hanover Trust, Bankers
Trust Company, National Bank of North America, and the Bank of
New York (Mullins, p. 179). Together, these banks owned about
63 percent of the New York Fed's outstanding stock. Mullins then
showed that many of these banks are owned by about a dozen
European banking organizations, mostly British, and most notably
the Rothschild banking dynasty. Through their American agents
they are able to select the board of directors for the New York Fed
and to direct U.S. monetary policy. Mullins explained,...
The Federal Reserve System certainly makes large profits.
According to the Board's 1995 Annual Report, the System had net
income totalling $23.9 billion, which, if it were a single firm,
would qualify it as one of the most profitable companies in the
world. How were these profits distributed? By an agreement
between the Borad of Governors and the Treasury, nearly all of the
Fed's annual profits are paid to the federal government.
Accordingly, a lion's share of $23.4 billion, which represents 97.9
percent of the Federal Reserve's net income, was transferred to the
Treasury. The Federal Reserve Banks kept $283 million, and the
remaining $231 million was paid to its stockholders as dividends.

Given that less than one percent of the Fed's net earnings are
distributed as dividends, it seems that an investor could easily find
much more profitable ways to store their wealth than buying
Federal Reserve stock. Regarding Schauf's lamentation, the Federal
Reserve System has been paying its profits to the Treasury since
1947.

Conclusion

It does not appear that the New York Federal Reserve Bank is
owned, either directly or indirectly, by foreigners. Neither Mullins
nor Kah provided verifyable sources for their allegations, nor did
their mysterious sources agree on exactly who owns the New York
Federal Reserve Bank. Moreover, their central assumption that
control of the New York Federal Reserve is the same as control of
the whole System is wrong and demonstrates a lack of
understanding of the System's basic organizational structure. The
profits of the Federal Reserve System, again contrary to the
assertion of Kah and Schauf, are funnelled back to the federal
government, not to an "international banking elite." If the U.S.
central bank is in the grip of a banking conspiracy, then Mullins
and Kah have certainly not uncovered it.

totse.com