Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DMaA who wrote (39738)	3/22/1999 1:30:00 PM
From: nuke44	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

Possibly, but on the whole there are very valid reasons for restricting information and physical access to a security clearance and need-to-know basis. If Monica was indeed granted a Top Secret clearance, then that was a travesty. Hopefully her need-to-know limited her access to nothing more prejudicial to national security than the Minuteman in Clinton's pants. The truth is, not one person in ten in the Clinton White House, including Clinton himself, would be granted a security clearance if they were subjected to the same criteria as those who serve in our armed forces. I hope the National Security Agency is changing our P.A.L. codes (Permissive Action Link)for our weapons at least ten times a day.