SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Leah Industries, Inc. (OTC-BB-LEAH) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: JAS who wrote (1757)3/22/1999 4:03:00 PM
From: DISHRAIDER  Respond to of 2153
 
<<I was told the company had told one of the board that if I didn't stop, they would consider legal action against me??????>>

I think its fair to say that they have other pressing problems now than to go after someone with legitimate issues. I wasnt a member at that time but you should also thank CAT because he was one that did back you up on your research.

<<Mabee some of this board should be investigated with the idea of legal action brought against them>>

That would be really interesting. Not sure how they go about it though.



To: JAS who wrote (1757)3/23/1999 1:14:00 AM
From: CYBERKEN  Respond to of 2153
 
<<I was called STUPID so many times I had to use
both my hands and feet to count them.>>

:->)



To: JAS who wrote (1757)3/23/1999 1:24:00 AM
From: CYBERKEN  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2153
 
Talk about fabrication of an issue. The company states that they have engaged a certain accounting firm. No one presents any proof that they have not, nor any motive for lying about it. Finally someone calls the SEC and demands that the stock be shut down because they allegedly didn't retain the accounting firm (again no evidence required!) The SEC FALLS FOR IT! And the same people who dreamed up the question claim justification.

At least I no longer wonder why the regulatory agency is so leery of the internet.