SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Boplicity who wrote (24665)3/22/1999 5:14:00 PM
From: Robert  Respond to of 152472
 
More ITU News

ITU Gives Up on Single 3G Standard
By Vanessa Clark
22 March 1999

It seems that the International Telecommunication Union's dream of a single, world-wide third generation mobile standard has died. News from the radio communications committee meeting which finished Friday indicates that the ITU has resigned itself to living with three competing air interfaces.

The meeting in Fortaleza, Brazil was set to finalize specifications for IMT-2000 - the ITU's brand for 3G systems - and also to resolve the long-running Intellectual Property Rights dispute between Qualcomm and Ericsson. Initial reports say the ITU failed to achieve either of these goals and settled for a compromise of three next generation air interfaces: cdma2000 - supported by a primarily North American group led by Qualcomm; wideband-CDMA, supported by European GSM manufacturers; and TDMA, supported by groups like the Universal Wireless Communications Consortium (UWCC). It then placed the responsibilty for making this family of standards work back in the hands of the manufacturers.

This flies in the face of the ITU's previous strong support for a single 3G mobile standard.

"As new leader of the ITU management team, I will do my best to assist the work of IMT-2000 and turn this dream into reality," said Yoshio Utsumi, secretary-general of the ITU at the beginning of the month. "We are closely watched in our efforts to lay the foundation for the future of telecommunication and will be judged by generations to some in our success - or failure, to bring the power of digital technology along with the full potential of affordable communication anywhere, anytime," he said.

However, many observers remain phlegmatic about the result. "It's not surprising," said Andrew Wright, principal consultant at Analysys. "No one camp ... stood anything to gain by giving up [their IPR]."

Further details are sketchy and no one is willing to comment on the IPR dispute until the ITU releases a statement on Wednesday.

The UWCC have emerged as unexpected winners with this decision - as few observers expected their TDMA proposal stood much chance of being first past the post in the race to back the standard chosen for IMT-2000.

"The results from Brazil are positive for TDMA and operators and consumers who want choices among 3G technologies," said Gregory Williams chairman of the UWCC and vice president of wireless sytems of SBC Communications Inc.

Some analysts suggest that having more than one 3G air interface might actually have benefits that outweigh the loss of seamless global roaming and economies of scale. "If networks are not easily upgradeable then implementing 3G could be delayed or expensive [for some groups]," said Analysys' Wright.

Robert.



To: Boplicity who wrote (24665)3/22/1999 5:15:00 PM
From: GO*QCOM  Respond to of 152472
 
THE FUN HAS STARTED!!CSCO rumor must be a tactic to throw off the press ect.Ericy is the one.Its a done deal! and now for the envelope please ?



To: Boplicity who wrote (24665)3/22/1999 5:36:00 PM
From: Valueman  Respond to of 152472
 
HDR would require a router in the installation, but that's hardly reason to buy QCOM. It's a rumor, and rumors don't have to make sense!



To: Boplicity who wrote (24665)3/23/1999 3:05:00 AM
From: JGoren  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
Cisco lacks wireless capabilities to compete with LU now that it has Ascend. Buyout now just as we are beginning to see the company blossom would be a terrible shame, and unless the institutional holders and new shareholders cave in to a high premium at this point, I cannot see any buyout taking place. I want to see Jacobs make the company a world-class behemoth franchise like Mfst or Intel.