SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: marginmike who wrote (24685)3/22/1999 8:35:00 PM
From: 2brasil  Respond to of 152472
 
Leap bidding status still uncertain

WASHINGTON, March 22 (Reuters) - Leap Wireless International Inc. (Nasdaq:LWIN -
news) will be bidding in this week's U.S. wireless license auction but federal regulators could
bounce it from the proceedings shortly thereafter.

The wireless telecommunications provider, spun off from Qualcomm Inc. (Nasdaq:QCOM -
news) last year, is hoping to win licenses reserved mainly for new and small businesses at a
Federal Communications Commission auction starting on Tuesday.

The problem is an option Qualcomm retained to purchase about 18 percent of Leap's stock.

Under FCC rules, the possible ownership stake by Qualcomm, with more than $3 billion in sales last year, could make San
Diego, California-based Leap ineligible to bid for most of the licenses at the auction.

Leap officials on Monday declined to comment.

The FCC conditionally approved Leap as a bidder for so-called C-Block and F-Block licenses at Tuesday's auction. More
than 95 percent of the 347 licenses being offered are in those two blocks.

FCC officials said Leap's qualification as a bidder could be revoked when the company's status as a small business is decided.
That decision could take anywhere from a few weeks to a few months.

On March 5, Leap asked for 30 more days to amend its original qualification request made last year. The March 5 letter
followed complaints from the U.S. Small Business Administration and other wireless carriers that Leap should not qualify for
the new and small company licenses.

FCC officials on Monday said they had not received Leap's amended request yet.

The issue first arose in October, when Leap sought to acquire four wireless licenses for $20 million from Airgate Wireless LLC.

Airgate won the licenses, covering several cities in North and South Carolina, at a previous government auction reserved for
new and small companies.

Under FCC rules, if the C-block licenses are transferred to a company that would not have qualified for the auction, the
acquirer must pay a substantial penalty.

So Leap asked the FCC to qualify it as a ''very small business'' under the agency's rules. That would allow Leap and its
Cricket Holdings subsidiary to buy the Airgate licenses without paying a penalty and also to participate in the upcoming auction.

The Small Business Administration and competitors objected, arguing that if Qualcomm exercised its option, Leap would not
qualify.

More Quotes
and News:
Leap Wireless International Inc (Nasdaq:LWIN - news)
Qualcomm Inc (Nasdaq:QCOM - news)
Related News Categories: US Market News

Help

Copyright © 1999 Reuters Limited. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Reuters content is expressly prohibited without the
prior written consent of Reuters. Reuters shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.
See our Important Disclaimers and Legal Information.
Questions or Comments?



To: marginmike who wrote (24685)3/22/1999 10:25:00 PM
From: Keith Feral  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 152472
 
Mike: Speculation about a buyout is being driven by ERICY who is desperate to prop their stock.

As for QCOM, I would like to refer to the report by Forward Concepts last year. They reported that CDMA handset sales would reach $19 Billion annually by 2003. Let's take a 7% royalty rate for QCOM - $1.3 Billion. Do you have any idea what the EPS would be today with only 70 million shares outstanding? Royalties alone would genrate almost $20 a share in EPS in 2003. Just for fun, let's throw a PE of 30 on $20. That yields a price target of $600 per share by 2003.

I think Maurice's projection that QCOM will hit $200 per share by the end of the year is very likely. I would like to start another side bet. How many stock splits will shareholders receive in the next 2 years? I am betting that the stock will split 3 times between now and the end of 2000. I think the first one will come after the earnings announcement on April 20th.

As for CSCO, I'll bet they would just love to acquire QCOM. Who wouldn't? QCOM better split the stock and get the market cap up to $10 billion before any offer would begin to look appealing. 2.5 times revenues would still be a steal for a company like CSCO or MSFT looking to buy growth.

Typically, 3 to 5 times sales is the norm for a high growth company. QCOM is currently ranked as the 3rd highest growth company in the US. Ultimately, an appropriate M & A model for a buyout should fetch $12 to $20 billion in market cap for the current shareholders.

One important thing to keep in mind, the current share price of QCOM means nothing condisering the fact there are only 70 million shares outstanding. As of today, the Price to sales model is about 1.5 times FY 99 revenue projection. I would not think the bidding for QCOM could reasonable take place below $180 per share. Top end bids could fetch as high as $270 per share.



To: marginmike who wrote (24685)3/23/1999 1:05:00 AM
From: Jim Lurgio  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
The other side of the coin Mike. Don't get upset just evaluate the source. It could be their all wrong but who knows ? Competition is healthy but when a partner of yours plays both sides one must think ? This is not a negative but just food for thought.?

biz.yahoo.com



To: marginmike who wrote (24685)3/23/1999 2:17:00 AM
From: Jon Koplik  Respond to of 152472
 
I guess we don't have to worry (at least right now) about our old "nightmare scenario" of someone swooping in when QCOM's share price was depressed and successfully acquiring the whole company for (a mere) $80 a share.

Which brings up another point -- do all of those wireless "analysts" still have 12 month price targets for Qualcomm of below today's close ? Anyone actually keep up on this stuff ?

Jon.