SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Nuinsco Resources (NWI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: mineman who wrote (2129)3/22/1999 8:34:00 PM
From: 4TNiner  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 5821
 
Good Post! There is no question that I use this source for much of my analysis. Your comments have been very interesting and while I sense that you are not a bull on this one the fact you are here obviously means NWI / Lac Rocher has captured your interest. I am not a big time investor so I will be a casualty if news is leaking (if negative) since I am not on the inside track. I obviously can mitigate my losses by reacting ASAP once the fan is hit. If the news is good I win by default since I am long. I may not have the opportunity to bottom fish first but . .



To: mineman who wrote (2129)3/22/1999 8:55:00 PM
From: Brumell  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 5821
 
I think my geo. friend in Quebec City area is pleased. At last there is someone who agrees with him that the NWI occurrence may be a remnant of something else.

However, he has a point to make about the other bulls-eye anamolies. I've copied his wording directly from an e-mail he sent.

<< I have a detailed geological map of the area (Lac Rocher area,
SI-32K09-C3G-98C) and the four bulls-eye anomalies are located over four different lithologies. One is in the granite intrusive (the NWI «plug»), one is over a diorite plug, the third over metagneisses and the last over amphibolites. Outcrops confirm these four settings. Small amount of copper (612 ppm) was found near the fourth anomaly (The SW one).

From that, I have concluded that they are probably not related. >>

I'm wondering if you might have any thoughts on the matter, Mineman, and what the implications might be? There could be some positive aspects.

Regards,

Bob