SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : International FiberCom, Inc. (NASDAQ- IFCI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Brian Nichols who wrote (1957)3/22/1999 8:48:00 PM
From: david james  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 3541
 
Go to the last 10q and look at the income statement. You will see 31 cents for the first 9 months.

freeedgar.com

The confusion comes from the fact that the way they did the acquisitions, the earnings and increase in the number of shares is backdated to previous quarters. So the 43 cents includes total earnings for the year for all the acquisitions, as well as the increase in number of shares.

One needs to remember that the auditors are giving their full audit to only the 10k. This is relatively common, especially when smaller companies are using big name auditors (e.g., BDO). They give guidance on the 10q, but they sign their names to only the 10k, and for them, they don't particularly care as to the quarter the earnings came - they are auditing only for the year, and figuring earnings for the year and taxes for the year.

It is possible that in the previous quarters, the company overestimated or underestimated their quarterly earnings by their interpretation of the rules. And with the acquisitions that occured, the rules would be complicated. The auditors calculate only the earnings for the year, and this is what IFCI reported.

What matters is the 43 cents, which is a strong number and should dispel some of the rumors that Southern's earnings would seriously hurt them.

My guess is that all those institutions that have been accumulating do have plans for IFCI. Hopefully the plan is to move it up sooner than later. But they are in control now.

Ask is at 7 1/2 - slightly up for the day.

David



To: Brian Nichols who wrote (1957)3/22/1999 8:53:00 PM
From: Marc Phelan  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3541
 
Brian,

If the numbers for IFCI were as great as you say they were, then the market would have treated it that way!

Ahh.... I did not say the numbers were "great", I am just a bit confused as to what the heck they really are and posed a question.
That's all.

I agree with you that the "market" did not think they were great.

Marc