Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Medinah Mining Inc. (MDHM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Handshake™ who wrote (10320)	3/23/1999 7:27:00 AM
From: Mike Gold	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 25548

Vince, have been reviewing drill locations for hole 1-6. Been able to figure out what House has been aiming for. Here's a passage out of research paper-the paper was discussing less minerlized types of breccia pipes known as "Magmatic-hydrothermal breccias"-subclass-pipes related to intrusions. Our pipe is the more minerlized, "Magmatic-hydrothermal breccias"-subclass-Porphyry-type deposit." But it is clear-where the breccia contacts the wall rock-best chance for highest minerlization-the drill holes have all been around the edges of the breecia surface expression-perhaps searching for this margin. Another favored area is the middle of the pipe-trend also should be increasing minerlization with depth in pipes. "Enhanced permeability resulting from more original open space between fragments and proximity to the sheeted zone, is believed to account for the higher-grade minerlization in the marginal parts of pipes"... "Instead of being homogeneously minerlized, many breccias contain only restricted volumes of ore-grade material. This is commonly present along part of a pipe marking, immediately adjoining the sheeted zone."