SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Nuinsco Resources (NWI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: mineman who wrote (2171)3/22/1999 10:36:00 PM
From: Brumell  Respond to of 5821
 
That's what I was worried about several weeks ago but on good advice, now think is highly unlikely. There are several good reasons why. It could also mean the richest nickel is very deep which is what the current drilling will soon tell us.

I have a sectional drawing that may be of interest to you. If you are interested, send a PM with your e-mail address and I'll forward it to you.

Don't think it would interest any non-geo types. It is technical and theoretical but offers some food for thought. It was done by my geo friend who worked the area although a bit more to the east for Falconbridge in the 70's. He was aware of the Osisko showing which you referred to in earlier posts 2 weeks or so, and which is located on the opposite shore of Lac Rocher.

Regards,

Bob



To: mineman who wrote (2171)3/22/1999 11:16:00 PM
From: Gary Nash  Respond to of 5821
 
Lots of head scratching and some good posts. It appears that mineman has re-opened an argument from the weekend as to the non-economics of the deposit. Remember, the rich halo HAS to be included in the economics as was pointed out; hell we are still talking about 40m of 2.5%, NOT 2-3m! Let's stick to the facts and hopefully NWI will keep pulling more holes of the same over 600+m. We don't need 40m of 10% like the market was/is expecting.