SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Technical analysis for shorts & longs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Clint E. who wrote (20332)3/23/1999 12:06:00 AM
From: Clint E.  Respond to of 69795
 
====Rivals criticize merged NSI, InterNIC site=====

news.com


Rivals criticize merged NSI, InterNIC
site
By Dan Goodin
Staff Writer, CNET News.com
March 22, 1999, 4:05 p.m. PT

update Just days after Network Solutions merged its Web site with one belonging to the
InterNIC, would-be competitors are crying foul, and the government is promising to
review the move to see whether it violates an exclusive contract it awarded to the
Internet registry.

The change, which was made over the weekend but not announced until today, means
that Web users who point their browsers to "www.internic.net" are directed to Network
Solutions' site.

NSI also made other technical changes that are making life difficult for companies
trying to compete with the Herndon, Virginia, firm. The move comes just weeks before
NSI is set to lose it government-appointed monopoly to register the most lucrative form
of Internet addresses.

"We were not consulted in advance of this change," said Becky Burr, an official who
oversees the NSI's contract with the Commerce Department. "We are reviewing the
change to make sure it's in compliance with the cooperative agreement."

Under its contract with the U.S. government, NSI must seek written permission from the
Commerce Department before implementing major changes in service.

Even as the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) has forged
a roadmap for creating competing registrars, NSI's precise relationship with InterNIC has
remained unclear. Under an exclusive contract with the Commerce Department, NSI
maintains InterNIC, which provides "bare bones" registry services to Internet service
providers and other firms with advanced technical skills.

But NSI and a raft of other companies also provide enhanced "registrar" services aimed
at people with little or no technical knowledge.
The merging of the two Web sites means that
customers seeking out InterNIC will
automatically be connected to NSI's Web site,
giving the company a leg up on competitors.

"The concern is that customers will be
shepherded to Network Solutions' services
and products in preference to the ISP that has
the customer," said Richard Forman, president
of Register.com, a registrar company vying to
compete with NSI.

NSI implemented the change to make it easier
for end users to register sites, company
spokeswoman Cheryl Regan said. She added
that those scaled-down services available on
the InterNIC site are still available by accessing
Network Solutions' site. "It's really just a new
face to improve the customer experience," she
said.

Under its contract with the U.S. government,
NSI owns the contents of the InterNIC
database. It appears that the government
owns the InterNIC trademark, meaning that
only it could object to NSI's move.

NSI also removed Telnet access to the InterNIC WhoIs database, which registries use to
tell customers if a domain name is available. The change, which was not announced,
made life difficult for registries that use programs to automatically sift through the
database.

Within the next few weeks, ICANN will require NSI to open its database to five authorized
companies so they can compete with NSI on more equal footing. After a trial run, ICANN
is expected to make the database available to any company that qualifies for
accreditation.

Even after the plan is in fully implemented, NSI will still maintain the master database and
will receive a small percentage of the fees collected by competitors.