SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Anthony@Pacific who wrote (23268)3/23/1999 4:02:00 AM
From: 1-DAY-TRADER  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 122087
 
Stock Analysis of Netegrity by VectorVest reveals pure fraud, investors insanity and ignorance.

Here is the analysis as of yesterday's close:

>> Thank you for requesting an analysis of Netegrity Inc. from VectorVest ProGraphics. The ticker symbol for Netegrity Inc. is NETE. NETE is traded on the NASDAQ.

PRICE: NETE closed on 03/22/1999 at $11.25 per share.

VALUE: NETE has a Value of $0.6 per share. Value is the foundation of the VectorVest system. It is a measure of what
a stock is currently worth. Value is based upon earnings, earnings growth rate, dividend payments, dividend growth rate,
and financial performance. Current interest and inflation rates also play an important role in the computation of Value.
When interest and/or inflation rates decrease, Value goes up. When interest rates and inflation increase, Value goes down.
Sooner or later a stock's Price and Value always converge.

RV (Relative Value): NETE has an RV of 0.01. On a scale of 0.00 to 2.00, an RV of 0.01 is very poor. RV reflects
the long-term price appreciation potential of the stock compared to an alternative investment in AAA Corporate Bonds.
Stocks with RV ratings above 1.00 have attractive upside potential. A stock will have an RV greater than 1.00 when its
Value is greater than Price, and its Relative Safety (see below) and forecasted earnings growth rate are above average. In
some cases, however, a stock's RV will be above 1.00 even though its Value is well below Price. This happens when a stock
has an exemplary record of financial performance and an above average earnings growth rate. In this case, the stock is
currently selling at a premium, and the investor is banking on future earnings growth to drive the stock's price higher. This
information is very useful not only in knowing whether or not a stock has favorable price appreciation potential, but it also
solves the riddle of whether to buy high growth, high P/E, or low growth, low P/E stocks.

We believe that RV ratings above 1.00 are required to consistently achieve above average capital gains in the stock market.

RS (Relative Safety): NETE has an RS rating of 0.65. On a scale of 0.00 to 2.00, an RS of 0.65 is poor. VectorVest
looks at safety from the viewpoint of an equity investor (one who is buying stock of a company) rather than that of a
purchaser of debt (one who is lending money to the company). From this perspective, consistency of financial and
operating performance, stock price appreciation history, and price volatility are the key factors used in the evaluation of
Relative Safety (RS). Debt to equity ratio, capitalization, sales volume, business longevity and other factors are also
considered, but to a lesser degree.

VectorVest favors steady, predictable performers. All stocks are rated on a scale of 0.00 to 2.00. A stock with an RS greater
than 1.00 is safer and more predictable than the average of all stocks. A stock with an RS less than 1.00 is less predictable
and riskier than the average stock.

RT (Relative Timing): NETE has an RT rating of 1.33. On a scale of 0.00 to 2.00, an RT of 1.33 is excellent. RT is
a fast, responsive, short-term price trend indicator. It analyzes the direction, magnitude, and dynamics of a stock's price
behavior over the last 13 weeks; then reflects and projects the short-term price performance of the stock. Once a stock's
Price has established a strong trend, it is expected to continue that trend for the short-term. If the trend dissipates, RT will
gravitate towards 1.00. Should the price change dramatically, RT will notice the crucial turning point. When warranted, it
will explode from a Price low and dive from a Price high.

All stocks are rated on a scale of 0.00 to 2.00. If RT is above 1.00,the stock's Price is in an uptrend. Below 1.00, the stock's
Price is in a downtrend.

VST-Vector (VST): NETE has a VST-Vector rating of 0.86. On a scale of 0.00 to 2.00, an VST of 0.86 is poor.
VST-Vector solves the dilemma of balancing Value, Safety and Timing. Stocks with high RV values often have low RS
values, or stocks withlow RV and RS values have high RT's. How can we find the stocks with the best combinations of
Value, Safety, and Timing?

The classic vector formula (square root of the sum of the squares) handles this problem. It combines a set of forces into a
single indicator for ranking every stock in the VectorVest database. Stocks with the highest VST-Vector have the best
combinations of Value, Safety and Timing. These are the ones to own for above average capital application.

GRT (Growth Rate): NETE has a GRT of -10 % per year. This is very poor. GRT stands for forecasted Earnings
Growth Rate in percent per year. GRT is updated each week for every stock. Watch GRT trends very carefully. If the
GRT trend is up, the stock's Price will likely rise. If the GRT trend is down, the stock's Price will increase more slowly,
cease to increase, or subsequently fall.

Recommendation (REC): NETE has a Hold recommendation. REC reflects the cumulative effect of all the
VectorVest parameters working together. These parameters are designed to help investors buy safe, undervalued stocks
which are rising in price, and to avoid or sell risky, overvalued stocks which are falling in price.

VectorVest is tuned to give an "H" or "B" signal when a stock's price is approximately 10% above a recent low, and an "S"
signal when the stock's price is approximately 10% below a recent high. High RV, RS stocks are favored toward receiving
"B" REC's, and sheltered from receiving "S" RECs.

STOP-PRICE: NETE has a Stop-Price of 9.90 per share. This is 1.35 or 12.0% belowits current closing Price.
VectorVest analyzes over 6,000 stocks each day for Value, Safety and Timing, and calculates a Stop-Price for each stock.
These Stop-Prices are based upon 13 week moving averages of closing prices, and are fine-tuned according to each stock's
fundamentals.

In the VectorVest system, a stock gets a "B" or an "H" recommendation if its price is above its Stop-Price, and an "S"
recommendation if its price is below its Stop-Price.

DIV (Dividend): NETE does not pay a dividend. VectorVest focuses on annual, regular, cash dividends indicated by
the most recent disbursement. Special distributions, one-time payments, stock dividends, etc., generally are not included in
Dividend (DIV).

DY (Dividend Yield): NETE has a DY of 0 percent. This is above the current market average of percent. DY equals
100 x (DIV/PRICE), and is expressed as a percentage.

EY (Earnings Yield): NETE has an EY of -2.07%. This is above the current market average of %. EY equals 100 x
(EARNINGS PER SHARE/PRICE), and is expressed as a percentage.

EPS (Earnings Per Share): NETE has an EPS of $-0.23 per share. EPS stands for leading 12 months Earnings Per
Share. VectorVest determines this forecast from a combination of recent earnings performance and traditional fiscal and/or
calendar year earnings forecasts.

P/E (Price to Earnings Ratio): NETE has a P/E ratio of -48.31. This ratio is computed daily based upon Price
and EPS. P/E = Price/EPS.

GPE (Growth to P/E Ratio): NETE has a GPE of 0. This ratio suggests that This ratio suggests that NETEis
overvalued. Growth to P/E ratio is a popular measure of stock valuation which compares Earnings Growth Rate (GRT) to
Price Earnings ratio (P/E). A stock is considered to be undervalued when GPE is greater than 1.00, and vice-versa.
VectorVest believes that RV is a much better indicator of long-term value. The RV of 0.01 for NETEis very poor.

DS (Dividend Safety): NETE has a DS of 0. On a scale of 0 to 99, a DS of 0 is poor. DS is defined as the assurance
that regular cash dividends will be declared and paid at current or at higher rates for the foreseeable future. Stocks with DS
values above 50 on a scale of 0 to 99 areabove average in safety.

RISK (Dividend Risk): NETE does not pay a dividend. All stocks in the VectorVest system that pay dividends
are classified as having Low, Medium or High Dividend Risk (RISK). Stocks with DS values above 50 are above average in
safety. These stocks are classified as having LOW or MEDIUM RISK. Stocks with DS values below 50 are below average
in safety and are classified as having HIGH Risk.

DG (Dividend Growth): NETE has a DG of 0 percent per year. Dividend Growth is a subtle yet important
indicator of a company's historical financial performance and the board's current outlook on the future use of funds.

YSG-VECTOR (Yield-Safety-Growth Vector): NETE has a YSG-Vector of 0. On a scale of 0.00 to 2.00,
an YSG-Vector rating of 0 is very poor. VectorVest combines Dividend YIELD, SAFETY and GROWTH into a single
parameter. YSG-Vector allows direct comparison of all dividend paying stocks. Stocks with the highest YSG-Vector values
have the best combinations of Dividend Yield, Safety and Growth. These are the stocks to buy for above average current
income and long-term growth.

VOL(100)s: NETE traded 1384700 shares on 03/22/1999.

AVG VOL(100)s: NETE has an Average Volume of 516340. Average Volume is 50 day moving average of daily
volume as computed by VectorVest.

% VOL: NETE had a Volume change of 168.2% from its 50 day moving average volume.

OPEN: NETE opened trading at $10.81 per share on 03/22/1999.

HIGH: NETE traded at a high of $12.44 per share on 03/22/1999.

LOW: NETE traded at a low of $10.13 per share on 03/22/1999.

CLOSE: NETE Closed trading at $11.25 per share on 03/22/1999.

% PRC: NETE showed a Price change of 11.8% from the prior day's closing price.

INDUSTRY: NETEhas been assigned to the Software (Business) Group. VectorVest classifies stocks into over 190
Industry Groups and 50 Business Sectors.

NETE has well below average safety with well below average upside potential. It reflects a stock which is likely to give well
below average, inconsistent returns over the long term.

The basic strategy of VectorVest is to buy low risk, high reward stocks. We suggest that Prudent investors buy enough high
Relative Value, high Relative Safety stocks to keep the overall RV and RS ratings of their portfolios above 1.00. As you do
this, you'll find that your risk will go down and your investment performance will improve. Not a bad combination.

Thank you for your interest in VectorVest ProGraphics.



To: Anthony@Pacific who wrote (23268)3/23/1999 8:25:00 AM
From: booray  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 122087
 
ANTHONY, COULD YOU POST MATT TYSON'S TELEPHONE NUMBER PLEASE, SO I CAN GET IN!!!!!!!! STILL WORKING ON YOUR SHIRT AND LOGO



To: Anthony@Pacific who wrote (23268)3/23/1999 9:03:00 AM
From: BenThair  Respond to of 122087
 
Just found this on the FNTN thread. Hope it helps.

To: FJ (11569 )
From: TechnoWiz
Tuesday, Mar 23 1999 4:37AM ET
Reply # of 11575

Good Morning FJ and Everyone: As you know, I tend to post
rather infrequently and only when I have something important to
say. Well I've got plenty to say this Tuesday.

No matter what has happened in the past, in amongst the
disappointments, there have been some notable successes. What
should not be lost on any investor in regards to this stock is that
by any measure with conventional or unconventional Internet
valuations, FNTN is woefully undervalued in comparison to most.

In addition in comparison to many BB companies, I believe FNTN
has been reasonably forthright in its investor relations, whilst not
overlooking the fact that some mistakes may have been made.

What is evident is that in general they have continued to surprise
us with the quality of their appointments to their board of directors,
the appointments of Alan Spar and Alan Ross, the apparent depth
of the relationship that is developing with Siemens and the
indisputable quality and dependability of their video and their
growing web presence.

Suddenly, the Internet is abuzz with Video-Mania. If Yahoo is now
trying to buy Broadcast.com (BCST), for 4 Billion Dollars, for fear
of being left behind in a rapidly emerging Video environment, how
much does that make FNTN worth? Perhaps a whole lot more
than it is now. Remember when FNTN took off last July when
Broadcast.com first went public? Based upon my rather
conservative valuation ratio between the two companies of 8 to 1
pre-split, FNTN should be around $6 per share based on its Video
potential alone.

At least you can actually get on demand video at FNTN, without
having to adjust your set and the fact that in this new age of
emerging Internet and Intranet Video, the broadcast medium of the
future, it's comforting to know that some of FNTN's valuation
should be measured in Michael Sheppard, who in is own right is
acknowledged to be one of the top Video specialists on the Planet.
I think that says a lot about where FNTN could be headed in the
unfolding innovations of the future.

If legendary Internet Incubator CMGI is willing to spend 100 (One
Hundred) Million Dollars to get into the Internet Video business in
direct competition to Broadcast.com, it tells you something about
the future and where we are headed. The good news is that the
Internet is now so huge, that there will be plenty of business for
everybody. In fact, it is quite likely that there will be too much
business and not enough companies. Definitely not enough
companies who can really deliver the goods dependably and
consistently.

In the process of conducting some routine research at the request
of a company who wanted to know more of the approximate
capabilities of FNTN's broadcast or multi-cast potential, I learned
that it is apparently, technically possible for some 5,000 to 10,000
viewers to simultaneously access FNTN's videos. Obviously this
has profound implications for any number of applications that may
be possible in the future.

Most here have invested in this company because of a strong
belief that they have something special and potentially unique that
is going to put them ahead of the curve. If Alan Spar proclaimed
that he saw FNTN a company with the most interesting potential
since the early days of Netscape, he must be seeing their vision of
the future in a way in which as yet we are all unable to and he
obviously must like what he sees.

The Internet is littered with all kinds of claims of perfect video, but
with few exceptions attempts at flawless quality viewing are few
and far between.

Monday, another company with Multimedia and Video aspirations,
Intervu (ITVU), shot up 13 5/8 to 47 dollars giving it a market cap
of some $400 Million. Does it deserve such a premium, the market
says yes, but only you can decide. Lets look at a few comparisons
that are not unlike Financial Intranet if you fast-forward one year
earlier in the case of Intervu and then compare revenues and
losses versus FNTN:

Intervu 1997 Revenues $ 143,000 Losses 5.2 Million
Intervu 1998 Revenues $1,700,000 Losses 15.7 Million

FNTN 1998 Revenues $ 98,.000 Losses 2.17 Million
FNTN Est 1999 Revenues $5,000,000 * Operationally profitable *

* Based on forward looking statements by Management

I'd say FNTN is doing a pretty good job of holding costs down and
if they can deliver on the claimed 1.5 - 1.75 Million as indicated
only requires as few signatures to complete within the first quarter,
I would call that impressive. FNTN would appear to have a lot
more going for it than the promise of many Internet high-flyers.

Now lets look at the SB2 and the likelihood that FNTN will soon be
full reporting. That alone based on the average gains of
companies achieving such status could add as much as $1.50 to
$2.00.

Next consider the fact that FNTN now has Financials available on
hundreds of thousand of Bloomberg terminals all over the World
under the heading of Internet Content - That means that Mutual
Funds and Research analysts on the prowl for undervalued
Internet / Intranet companies are going to stumble on FNTN
sooner or later. Now that FNTN is in this category, should any of
the rumored upcoming publicity on CNBC or CNN eventuate, most
investors, broker dealers and Investors are going to be checking
their terminals as they routinely do when any kind of new kid on
the block shows up. As the content of their Website continues to
improve and some new videos are probably featured, this could
become a compelling situation for many long term investors,
especially if the financials improve.

Then on top of that there is Siemens: Anyone who underestimates
the importance of Siemens recent statements that they see
Financial Intranet and the Belgian Government as their two
Multimedia showcase vehicles of choice for the US and Europe, if
not the World, is not reading the real message here. For a huge
Multinational to make the kind of statements about Financial
Intranet it has recently made, has to be major news.

Don't forget Financial Intranet has had quite a long relationship
with Siemens now and was there in the beginning mapping out the
future with them before the Internet went crazy. Now that FNTN's
and Siemens jointly developed expertise is showing such
outstanding promise in the fast changing World of the Internet that
is now all of a sudden gripped by a Video fever and Video mania,
things could change very fast. If for example CMGI or some other
suitors started sniffing around, would Siemens spring to their
defense and a bidding war ensue. Stranger things have
happened, including a sudden rash of acquisitions by Siemens in
the multi-billions in its mission to assemble the Internet
infrastructure of the future: VIDEO! Where does FNTN fit in. Well
they've got great VIDEO and potentially they've got the content
and the means to deliver it to the masses.

Now lets take a look at another company to compare with
Financial Intranet.

Pronetlink is well known to many on this thread and some people
have periodically asked for my comments.

I must admit I missed the recent explosive move up in Pronetlink
(PNLK), because like FNTN, it was sitting at around the same
levels that FNTN is now trading at and lo and behold, just one
announcement of a joint venture or strategic partnership with
AT&T was enough to send this stock from .75c to almost $3 in
less than 24 hours. Now I forget the exact nature of the release,
but it seemed to me to be a lot like the kind of relationship that
Financial Intranet already has with Worldcom going back two
years, which since FNTN made its arrangements has grown in
size and stature to equal AT&T. ($173 Bn). Since Financial
Intranet became a strategic partner of Worldcom it has grown
fourfold to a market cap of $167 Bn and is one of the most
aggressively expanding Telecommunications companies in history.
They seem to have a knack for associating themselves with big
winners. A couple of years ago Siemens was not considered a
Web presence. Today they've got some of the hottest
award-winning technology on the Planet.

Interestingly Pronetlink has a rather unique service that appears to
hold considerable potential and like FNTN has captured the
imagination of many investors alike. Whilst I find cruising around
the FNTN website relatively simple, I have had some problems in
doing searches on their site and trying to get a handle on how
their business model really works and what it offers. At least most
of the information available at Financial Intranet is tangible and
useful and is readily and rapidly available. The most amazing part
is that Pronetlink has 36 million shares out, but that didn't stop it
from tripling in a day, giving it a market cap that has fluctuated
between $75 Million and $100 Million. I haven't yet found out how
their financials look.

And here's something else. At least FNTN has its own data feed
and somewhat proprietary format for the delivery of Financial
Information, Charts and other data.

Last week a company called Multex.com went public with an
opening market cap of $720 Million and they don't even have their
own charts and quotes. They are relayed from another vendor.
Considering the wealth of information including extensive Mutual
Fund Info available, I think FNTN deserves a much higher
valuation by the marketplace. Seems almost as if their Intranet
component is not factored into the equation. Do we have to wait
for an Intranet mania to develop before our day will come.

In spite of all, that may come soon. If FNTN starts getting besieged
with offers from Broker Dealers and Institutions to underwrite or
market their APO, this issue could become quickly oversubscribed
leaving the common stock as the only means to invest in the
venture. Since Internet IPO's are selling out within an average of
30 mins on some of the online brokerage websites, it stands to
reason that an Internet company selling at a substantial discount
to most other Internet IPO's could be snapped up very rapidly.

In summary, I would have to speculate that when the much
rumored joint announcement with Siemens goes out round the
World and investors begin to wake up to some of the unforeseen
potential in this company, market forces will not be able to hold
this stock down. Especially if they can deliver all the toppings!

fntn.com

Rgds to all

Wiz

Next

Previous