Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: 1-DAY-TRADER who wrote (23277)	3/23/1999 5:01:00 AM
From: Doug R	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 122087

With just as much "due respect", I am a technical analyst. I have developed more technically oriented "stuff" than you would care to imagine. I'll leave it at that. All ROFLMAO aside, what the heck are you doing with a name like that while purporting to rely on "fundamentals"?? Doug R

To: 1-DAY-TRADER who wrote (23277)	3/23/1999 7:35:00 AM
From: QuietWon	Respond to of 122087

If I can chime in on vv. About a yr ago when I was first was researching on funamentals, then looking at technicals, I came across vv. I printed out their analyses on a few stocks. I concur they were wrong more than right. I have commented on why/how vv can be wrong ie., the things vv does not take into account. Trying to rem them at this very sec, I should have kept a list. I am not bothering to go back to vv and run thru their analysis on any stock. A few things of note that vv does not do to best of my belief w/o chking vv: 1) look at a sector - co cud be weak, but esector strong 2) same as 1), but for the market 3) I know I've commented on an intricacy of their valuation before Pt is I would not rely on vv. When I do TA, I do my own.